User talk:68.50.171.165

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nicanor Fulgencio‎. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. SmileToday☺(talk to me , My edits) 20:42, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Nicanor Fulgencio. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Brianga 09:02, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


[edit] July 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Nicanor, you will be blocked from editing. slakr 09:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Nicanor Fulgencio, you will be blocked from editing. slakr 09:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] re: look it up

Then please nominate it at Articles for Deletion instead of blanking it repeatedly despite being warned not to. Thanks. --slakr 09:12, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

That page does not meet speedy deletion criteria. I repeat, please list it on Articles for Deletion or Proposed deletion --slakr 09:19, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
the creator's version of the page is not clear vandalism, asserts notability, is coherent, and therefore does not qualify under Criteria for speedy deletion. Sorry. --slakr 09:28, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] re: ?

It's not blatant vandalism. Moreover, the page is also mentioned on Vito Corleone. Whether it's factually inaccurate is irrelevant. Factually-inaccurate information, that, at face value satisfies all other criteria, will receive proposed deletion procedures or an articles for deletion discussion unless it's blatantly obviously vandalism. Every minute you spend arguing about this is another minute the alleged fraudulent page survives; so, if you feel the page should be deleted, then I highly suggest you follow my advice and go through the motions of Wikipedia's deletion policy. Carefully read the links I've sent you and you might be able to have the page removed in under a week. Best of luck. --slakr 09:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
In addition, you may want to register an account so you can proceed with the articles for deletion process. SmileToday☺(talk to me , My edits) 19:40, 3 July 2007 (UTC)