User talk:68.5.242.136

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Place any new comments at the bottom of the list or under a current existing topic. Any comment added to the top will be deleted.

Contents

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. -- Szvest 23:50, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Everything I wrote has been verified and published in other media. The people who objected to my comments want to deny the truth and only see their own reality. I tried to modify the comments and show attribution to mollify them, but they still undid everything I posted in an attempt to conceal the truth.

[edit] Unblock

"{{unblockEverything I wrote has been verified and published in other media. The people who objected to my comments want to deny the truth and only see their own reality. I tried to modify the comments and show attribution to mollify them, but they still undid everything I posted in an attempt to conceal the truth.}}"

[edit] Contact

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "(none)"

Decline reason: "request denied after reviewing contributions --Can't sleep, clown will eat me 15:28, 11 August 2006 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] Cite Your Sources

You said that what you're posting has been verified by the media. Well, then cite your sources! Provide a link to the articles that prove your statements. That way, they won't be revered. --D-Day I'm all ears How can I improve? 12:12, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The truth will out

If want to pretend the truth doesn't exist, go ahead. Jesus Christ himself knows that everything I wrote was true.

[edit] Court documents to prove what I said

I have sited affidavits filed in court to verify what I said. The truth will set you free.In affidavits filed in court Mayfield blamed his firing on the romantic relationship between Ray Evernham and Erin Crocker. http://www.scenedaily.com/stories/2006/08/14/scene_daily32.html

[edit] Thank You

Now that you have provided us with some backing, we can work with what you have instead of deleting it. Thank you for contributing. :) Captain Spyro 05:03, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Erin Crocker

This one: Talk:Erin Crocker. Recury 00:53, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Erin Crocker

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Erin Crocker, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- DiegoTehMexican 02:38, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Erin Crocker, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- DiegoTehMexican 15:24, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Editing, not Vandalizing

Its editing not vandalizing and I have explained on the article's talk page why the edits are important. I also explained why I am being singled out and personally attacked by several people. But I know that they are determined to silence the truth, so be it.

[edit] Nice

Just got back from a nice motorcycle ride to see that I was blocked. I hope you all feel triumphant and better about your world. You will see that I am correct in my sources and in my judgement that this info is critical to the career opportunities of this driver. I am happy to have fulfilled some of your innermost needs.

[edit] No Personal Attacks.

OK, 68.5.242.136, now you have gone to far. Stop. Read the following link. Wikipedia:No personal attacks. That is an official Wikipedia policy. Might I emphasize, we are not attacking you, merely reinforcing that WP:LIVING requires possibly libelous statements to be proven beyond doubt and proven to be notable, not merely probably true and thought or implied to be related. (In this case, it isn't 100% proven to be true, but is stated to be true by an ex-employee. Further, it is not necessarily the only or even main reason that she is racing for Evernham. Could be, but until proven, cannot be part of the article. Again, in 20 years, if it it true, and if it is important, it will and must be part of the article, but not until then.) -slowpokeiv 23:44, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

I am being personally bullied & attacked by people who wish to have the truth hidden. I know a smokescreen reason when I see one. I choose not to drink the kool-aid. Its obvious the four of you will do whatever you want, I already gave you people permission to take your actions, but that doesn't mean I have to agree with it.

[edit] The truth is out there

"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." George Orwell

[edit] Adding comments from the Erin Crocker page

I'm back from the Dr., not good news so maybe I'll take a motorcycle ride later to clear my head. Anyway, just wanted to reiterate that my editing entries were valid and truthful and that my sources (court documents, NY Times) were excellent. Its clear from the changes that outside pressure has been placed upon this site (perhaps threats of lawsuits) to keep certain information out of the public eye. I understand why certain parties wish to white wash public information and I'm sure you need to protect yourselves against the threat of actions the interested parties are pursuing. If my entries are deleted or my ability to edit taken away, I will know who is responsible as they are obviously very serious about silencing this information. Its a shame that you have to cave into this pressure and run and hide. To quote George Orwell "In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." Your silenced friend #68

Not trolling, want you all to understand that I now know why my comments were deleted. Dear Ms Recury, I guess you are directing the troll comment to me since you put it in after my comment. I assure you I meant every word I wrote. I assume this troll comment is some sort of "neutral" way for you to follow the orders that have been given to silence this information. Again, as I have stated, now that I understand who/what is behind this I understand the actions you all are forced to take to avoid the threats and litigation. None of that changes the facts in my posts.

[edit] Evernham Motorsports page

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Captain Spyro 09:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

You know I did nothing but tell the truth and site court documents. "In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." George Orwell 68.5.242.136

Enough. There is no conspiracy. There's no cabal. There's nothing except for the fact you refuse to cooperate. Time for a dose of reality here. Now you've gotten yourself banned. Perhaps is you had an entirely different attitude, we could have worked something out, but don't even think of coming back if you're just going to float these black-helicopter fantasies of yours. I won't have it, and neither will anybody else. Good day to you. --D-Day I'm all ears 20:43, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

I was not talking about helicopters. Maybe you have me confused with some other editor. I was talking about the court documents where Jeremy Mayfield said that the "close personal relationship" was critical to his being fired by Evernham. This is important to the history of the #19 car. THe public revelation that Evernham was having an extra marital affair with Erin Crocker caused embarrassment and was a main reason Evernham fired Mayfield. I sited the documents to back this up. Also the mention was made of Kahne being given Mayfield's old team as a major contributor to this situation. Both are equally relevant and important.68.5.242.136

D-Day was being subjective; not literal on the choppers. Anywho, the blatant misuse of Wikipedia must stop. As of now, you are in violation of the WP:3RR. If you revert the article one more time, you will again be reported.Captain Spyro 01:31, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Why is a truthful and factual( court documents and NY Times quotes) entry misuse? It is misuse to white wash the facts in an attempt to make a situation seem other than what it was, but I am not trying to report any of you or get you blocked. I would not have to keep entering the truthful quotes and situation if you and your friends did not feel that you have to hide the facts.68.5.242.136

[edit] Reply

Ah, try WP:AN/3RR#Sample violation report to copy, although I think the report might be stale by now. Anyways, I'd really rather not get involved. What I reccomend is that you get an account and try following the dispute resolution process. Cheers, Khoikhoi 08:58, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

I appreciate your response. Someone is trying to use technicalities to not allow me to edit and add truthful entries.