User talk:68.43.140.213

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Contents

[edit] Feb 5, 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pschemp | Talk 07:09, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pschemp | Talk 07:12, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] March 2006

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fawcett5 15:03, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RPG Maker edits

Thanks for your edits to the RPG Maker article! I especially like how you corrected the fact that The Way's graphics were made with Bryce rather than Maya. I completely missed that obvious lie. --Michiel Sikma 09:28, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Michiel Sikma 07:02, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Vaginal flatulence, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Intinn 21:51, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.

¡Dustimagic! (T/C) 19:34, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 1 April 2006

Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. Sango123 (e) 00:47, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 19:42, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Michiel Sikma 19:42, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Oral sex

Stop removing content from the article! --tasc 13:39, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] April 14

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Mrtea (talk) 15:02, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Powerpuff Girls

You have repeatedly readded this sentence, "In the "Crazy Mixed-up Puffs" episode, there is a scene in which Buttercup farts." This is either inappropriate or it isn't true. You better stop readding the sentence or else you will be blocked. Marcus2 13:42, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Maybe I might have been mistaken about your edit there, but I can see from previous discussions on this very talk page that you've been in trouble here on Wikipedia more than once. That's why I'm a little confused about your behavior and character. Marcus2 15:38, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

But maybe I shouldn't have talked so inappropriately. I'm sorry. Marcus2 15:45, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] April 19

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Arniep 00:47, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.

Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 68.43.140.213). Logging in does not require any personal details. There are many other benefits for logging in to Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can type {{helpme}} on this page and an experienced Wikipedian will be around to answer any questions you may have.

Please note these points:

  • Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
  • Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
  • If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
  • Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Both adding such unreasonable information and editing articles maliciously are considered vandalism.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, ask me on my Talk page – I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia.

Blanking these warnings if inappropriate. If you would like to start with a clean slate, please register an account. That way, no one else will be editing from the same IP. If vandalism continues to occur with this user IP, it will be blocked. pschemp | talk 03:35, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Aeons/Angels

Just wanted to say- Nice try, editing the Aeon article to support your XG vs. NGE vendetta. Druff 02:01, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Stop editing the Xenogears page by removing legitimate data regarding blatant Xenogears vs. Evangelion connections before discussing their removal first, and successfully providing acceptable reasons that warrant their removal rather than mild alteration. This is what the "discussion" page is for. All of the deletions you made of my entries over the past few days were for inaccurate and inappropriate reasons, as I have argued on the discussion page. I notice you didn't bother to respond there, but kept on making deletions. Regarding my Aeon edit, I included additional information not to support any sort of "vendetta," but to make the article more informative after having glanced it over. Study general definitions of Aeons and Angels; what they are in nature; and you'll see there is a distinct similarity between the two. Both are servants of God, both are emanations of divine power, both carry out the will of God, and in fact, certain Aeons, such as Armozel, are Angels[[1]]. But again, even if that wasn't the case, the "Aeons" in Xenogears still look like traditional angels, and bear multiple similarities to Evangelion's angels.
That said, I have reverted your edits again, and will continue to do so until you can provide valid reasons for your actions and reach some sort of agreement. Please refer to Wikipedia's etiquette policy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Etiquette), and see that reaching agreements on edits and avoiding deletion are promoted guidelines. In addition, I have given you no reason to believe I am editing out of anything other than good faith principles of making articles more informative, yet you have assumed that I have some sort of a "vendetta" for adding information that is commonly discussed at large, and is written in an entirely non-biased manner. Assuming good faith is yet another etiquette guideline that should be followed, as outlined in the above article.
-Fred 08:40, 25 April 2006 (PST)
Simply put, I delete any info which is blatantly erroneous or of dubious value. An example of erroneous info in this case is "Grahf is Fei's father." It simply isn't true, and I've explained why on the Xenogears talk page. An example of info of dubious value is pointing out that both EVA and Xenogears both have cutsey comic relief mascot characters with N-N names. That's akin to pointing out that both the 2007 Toyota Corolla and the 1998 Honda Civic both have four drink holders instead of two. While the statement might be true, it has no value, since so many other vehicles also have four drink holders. There's no point in pointing out that both EVA and Xenogears have cute animal mascots whose names are a repetion of a syllable when it's also true that Mach Go Go Go a.k.a. Speed Racer had a cutsey animal named Chim-Chim in 1967, Utena had a cutsey animal character named Chu-Chu (Japanese onomatopoeia for "squeek", as a mouse) and so on and so forth.
And besides, I did give my reasons for deleting the info in the comment line when I first made the deletions, as I always do. That should suffice. But don't expect me to repeat that courtesy when you insist on re-posting the same inaccurate info again and again.
Furthermore, I do have valid reason to believe you're pursuing a personal vendetta. A couple of quotes from your first edits to the Xenogears article:
...its similarities to aforementioned works (particularly and infamously Neon Genesis Evangelion) are so frequent and so similar in nature that its plot borders on flat-out plagiarism.
Other plot criticms include the allegation that Xenogears, like most of Squaresoft's titles, contains many "tiresome" and "uncreative" plot cliches, and to such critics, feels like a pulp production.
Blatant non-NPV. You were wise to quickly edit those comments yourself, but they betrayed your true intentions from the beginning. Druff 05:09, 26 April 2006 (UTC)