User talk:68.40.253.199

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Please Note

Wikipedia is not the place to post your hateful invectives against liberals. Perhaps [redacted per NPA] would interest you more, as they all think what you do. Regardless, if you continue to post such messages on talk pages, you will be banned. See WP:NOT for more info. David Fuchs (talk / frog blast the vent core!) 21:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Per WP:NOT, please avoid turning talk pages into a debate page. Wikipedia articles are for discussing the content of the article, not the subject (i.e. writting on what information should be included and what sections needs to be worked on AND NOT writting on what you think of the subject).--danielfolsom 18:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
I was commenting on the talk on ann coulter's page - this comment. Most of what you said in there isn't allowed per wp guidelines - while your comment started out ok - it got pretty bad here:
“ I know you liberals are bitterly disappointed that the grown ups demolised yet another in your never ending silly MANUFACUTED fantasy 'scandals' against a prominent conservative who's beating your brains out in the court of public opinion. (Not as painful, of course, as the Fitzmas Debacle that wound up leaving you with nothing but fossil fuel remnants) but rancid tasting nonetheless. ”
I hardly think it was a cheapshot - again, it's Wikipedia policy. (Note: I moved the comment you left me to my talk page -that's generally where you place comments - to get to my talk page click on "folsom" - the green part)--danielfolsom 17:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
I kind of see where you're comming from - although just because other people put stuff like you said in, doesn't mean that you should. The only person you should worry about is yourself - if you see people making comments like that just remember to remain civil - and if neccesary ignore them. --danielfolsom 18:52, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

You can call it unfair all you want, but that's like watching a truck about to cut you off & run you off the road -but not deciding to brake because you shouldn't have to. Or - if you see other people stealing, and you decide to steal and you get caught - your defense can't be "but they did it too!" -because the fact is you should've ignored them.--danielfolsom 01:30, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Again- feel free to do all of that - but also know that should you continue - you may be blocked. And you can't use "but they were doing it too" as a reason to be unblocked. It'd be the same if you were in a car speeding and a police officer caught you - you were caught - no one else matters--danielfolsom 04:32, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm not going to block you because I can't block people -only admins can, i'm merely saying that what you're doing can get you blocked. Regardless of whether you're a liberal or conservative - you need to follow wikipedia guidelines.(including WP:NPA--danielfolsom 04:05, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you are not going to contribute meaningfully to the Wiki, and instead going to push your political agenda, I will block you. David Fuchs 23:39, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:Policy

Wikipedia isn't a debate - it's an encyclopedia. The reason people are telling you to stop posting those comments is not because they are right-wing, but rather because they simply violate Wikipedia policy. I think the issue is you don't know what the policies are - so I'll give you direct links. Here is a list of what wikipedia is not - however I've linked to the very section of it that you are violating - wikipedia is not a forum. We discuss articles on wikipedia - not their subject. That means discussing grammar and sourcing is ok, but discussing how liberals are trying to take over the world is not. If you are only here to do that - then don't bother editing - because you'll be blocked. Instead, there are hundreds of websites where you can debate in that matter - and if you so wish I'd be happy to provide a link for you.

But hopefully you're on the encyclopedia to improve it. In that case, I suggest you take a look at the Wikipedia:Five pillars - a brief explanation of what Wikipedia is, and also the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset - all of the rules of wikipedia compacted into one page. There are a lot of policies on Wikipedia, and at some point or another you'll unwittingly violate one, I know I have, but the point is to try your best. If you do happen to violate a rule - an editor will certainly inform you and will be happy to help you if you are confused.

If you have any questions - feel free to ask me, just remember to remain WP:CIVIL - meaning don't throw out accusations of me being a liberal out to get you. Also, remember to sign your post with four tildes (~~~~) which will give you a signature and allow people to identify you and easily access your talk page for communication. Best of luck, --danielfolsom 02:50, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

I've blocked you. Like I stated before, if you're so worried about "liberal bias", why don't you just go edit Conservapedia, where everyone agrees with you? But if you're not in the business of building a worthwhile, free, accurate, and comprehensive encyclopedia, then why are you here? David Fuchs 13:44, 28 June 2007 (UTC)