User talk:68.207.117.147

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 68.207.117.147, is registered to Road Runner HoldCo LLC, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.


Contents

[edit] Your edit to Uwe Boll

Your recent edit to Uwe Boll (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 03:04, 12 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] April 2007

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Uwe Boll; this is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Linnell 03:06, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

All contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:RoyBoy may be offensive or unwelcome. In case you are the user, please login under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, particularly to userpages. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. -Mschel 03:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Multiple Vandalism

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --24.136.230.38 00:05, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

That doesn't mean you have the right to remove warnings. If you would like to make useful contributions, please create an account. Thank you! --24.136.230.38 00:12, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

I can only give you the same advice, in regards to creating an account. Those warnings are from before this company acquired the IP address. Further harassment can and may be met with legal action. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR BEING A NUISANCE, in my opinion. --68.207.117.147 00:20, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Warning a user for actions deemed against Wikipedia policy is in no way able to be met with legal action. The user was in no way overstepping their bounds. Unfounded or vindictive threats of legal action are grounds for action against your Wikipedia access using this IP. Please refer to WP:THREAT. -- KirinX 20:43, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
I have blocked you for 3 days for making legal threats[1]. Any attempt to influence an editors behavior with legal action is a blockable offense. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 03:59, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Is it ok, if I post my personal opinion of you or anyone who post on this page, as a reply on this same page? Since it is my talk page.


[edit] (Crossposted message from User talk:KirinX)

[edit] Thank you for your input

Thank you for your input, it shall certainly be taken into consideration. --68.207.117.147 03:03, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Also that was not a legal threat, that was simply a statement of what can be done.

If you must take legal action, we cannot prevent you from doing so. However, we require that you do not edit Wikipedia until the legal matter has been resolved to ensure that all legal processes happen via proper legal channels.

I was not threatening to sue him, I was simply telling him that I rather not be harassed by him anymore. Also to be clear I am not threatening you with anything, but I would simply like for you not to speak to me again. This is why wiki will never be a reliable, useful, legitimate source for anything other than documenting television shows....the users oh and plagiarism. Like in the Annie Oakley article which I addressed today and of course no one cares. Because it is wiki. --68.207.117.147 03:53, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
"Also to be clear I am not threatening you with anything, but I would simply like for you not to speak to me again." ... While in itself a perfectly reasonable request, firstly, you do have the right to ask me not to speak to you again. However, I have the right to ignore your request, as this is a public website, to which you do not own the rights, even to your own talk page. Secondly, I have the rights to reply to messages you have left me, or for any reason that might require me to warn you for actions taken against Wikipedia policy. Same as you have the right to do similarly. Thank you and good day. -- KirinX 16:35, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
In that case I guess I will respond to you by saying that I have the right to once again request for you to stop being obnoxious and leave me alone. If you will not, than so be it. I hope you feel high and mighty for being a big shot in the worlds most inaccurate and plagiarized encyclopedia. Honestly the only thing I care about editing and looking at on this "wonderful" site is television shows, since there is no other source as well compounded as Wiki in that sense.
But let me ask you something, how is it that things like user comments are checked so quickly, and the request for the stolen (plagiarized)material from the Annie Oakley article still goes unchecked. And that is a serious question, do people just check the recent changes page scouring for edits to revise or their some sort of filters to see specific types of edits. And if you really want to do something useful check the article I already mentioned and tag it for plagiarism, I provided the site it was copied from in its discussion section...or I guess you can choose not to and do something more useful like see who I've made threats to... --68.207.117.147 17:14, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
I have no intentions of 'dragging you through the mud' as you seem to imply, I am not an administrator here at Wikipedia, nor do I claim to be. However, Wikipedia allows common users the ability to police the site. Once again, you must realize that while it is within your right to ask people not to reply to you, they are more than within their right to do so, and should do so. Asking people not to message you or talk to you or whatever is simply pointless. If you do not wish to interact with fellow Wikipedians, I suggest you not interact with them by not editing the encyclopedia. This is a community-based, community-built site. You must recognize that you will be interacting with other Wikipedia users, like it or not.
However, I will attempt to find out what your issue with Annie Oakley's article is. Which brings me to my answer to your original question, "how is it that things like user comments are checked so quickly...": This is due to the fact that helpful users patrol more for vandalism than they do for inaccuracies, which itself is due to the fact that the vandals are usually the ones introducing the inaccuracies to begin with.
And... just so you are aware, I will not reply to you if you do not reply to me. Otherwise I will assume your replies (in which so far you have continued to ask questions) are asking for a reply of their own. -- KirinX 17:34, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Legal threats is something we block on sight for. And yes, that was a legal threat. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 04:10, 18 April 2007 (UTC)