User talk:68.10.35.153

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This host, ip68-10-35-153.rn.hr.cox.net, is registered to Cox Communications serving West Helena, Arkansas, an Internet service provider through which numerous individual users may connect to the Internet via proxy. This IP address may be reassigned to a different person when the current user disconnects.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.


[Incoherent and possibly offensive comments by the IP removed. (Here, if anyone is interested.)]

[FYI, this guy is an admited neo-Nazi[1] who believes Wikipedia is run by "the Jews."[2]]

Contents

[edit] Bill White Article

Bill, I talked to Will Beback, and I'm going to see about salvaging your recent edits to your own Bio. Though I stand on the opposite side as you, your edits did make the article much better. I probably will have the hybrid of the two versions done in the next few days, and then I'm going to tag it as needing citations. Please track down any citations you can, this will stop the changes from being reverted.

And create an account, would you?

Sadena 13:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC)


Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires you to provide no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

  • The use of a username of your choice
  • The ability to view all your contributions via a "My contributions" link
  • Your own user page
  • Your own talk page which, if you choose, also allows users to send you messages without knowing your e-mail address
  • The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you
  • The ability to rename pages
  • The ability to upload images
  • The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website
  • The eligibility to become an administrator
  • The right to be heard in formal votes and elections, and on pages like votes for deletion
  • Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. - Willmcw 19:02, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)

PS - Thanks for your contributions. Two important policies in Wikipedia are Wikipedia: No original research and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. In particular, I see that you've been adding information that seems to come from your personal experience rather than from newspaper accounts or other verifiable sources. Please only use facts that you have a source for, and cite your sources. Thanks, -Willmcw 19:02, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)

Someone who posts unsourced crap from the chans shouldn't talk about original resource. Go fuck yourself you anti-racist pig. ... posted at 15:38, 29 March 2007 by the IP

[edit] 3RR

You and your user account User:Baxter3 appear to have violated the Three revert rule (3RR) at William White (agitator). As you haven't been warned before, I'm not going to report it, but if you do it again, you will be reported, and are likely to be blocked from editing for up to 24 hours for each offense. Please also read our core policies before editing any further, particularly No original research, Neutral point of view, Verifiability, and Cite sources. Many thanks, SlimVirgin (talk) 00:56, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)

SlimVirgin: I have repeatedly undone vandalism you performed on the page, and I was not the only user to do so. I am reporting you for page vandalism and violations of the 3RR rule, and asking for dispute resolution. You are abusing Wikipedia policies for your own political ends, and that is not acceptable. This is also not the first time you have done so. 68.10.35.153 00:58, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
For the record, only you and Sam Spade have reverted my edits. Other editors on the page have expressed agreement with them; and edits don't count as vandalism just because you don't like them. If you would stop your reverting, and wait until I've finished editing the page (which may take a few days), you might find you actually prefer the new version. It will be more encyclopedic, will explain why White is of interest (which your version fails to do), and will be fully referenced. SlimVirgin (talk) 03:04, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
You and Willmcw are the only wo editors really involved, and Willmcw is not rving to your versions. Your edits are being incorporated itno the article -- in fact, I even footnoted your articlef or you (which one of your own followers deleted!). Massive deleting of cited sources, followed by a complaint that the article is "not sourced" and must be deleted, is vandalism, as there is no intellectual honesty involved. 68.10.35.153 18:32, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

You must not be familiar with the new policy. Fuck you, Fuck Wikipedia, and Fuck Off. ... added at 16:39, 31 March 2007 by the IP

[edit] Bill White (activist)

I've just about finished the rewrite of this page. If you take a close look at it, I think you'll find that it's a fair and well-sourced write up. (In case it's been changed since I last looked, check the last version under my name.) I've tried to stick closely to what the third-party sources say, and linked to them whenever I could - though sometimes I had to link to websites other than those of the news organizations, because not all the articles are online. Rather than reverting, how about letting me know what specifically you disagree with, if anything? Or if you think something important has been left out, or something has been emphasized unfairly, please say how you think it could be rectified, bearing in mind that it probably shouldn't get much longer. Regarding the list of articles you wanted, Willmcw suggested as a compromise that we put a link to the list on your website under External links; he or I will do that as soon as we can access your site. I'm also posting this to User:Baxter2 and User:Baxter3. SlimVirgin (talk) 09:33, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] vandalism

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Jtkiefer T | @ | C ----- 23:15, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Jerry Springer

You dont need to put the adress of Jerry and Steve, its not right. Koolgiy


[edit] February 2007

Please stop. Continuing to add unsourced or original content, as you did to World Union of National Socialists, is considered vandalism and may result in a block. RJASE1 02:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning

I didn't make the edits, and I am not Wewelsburg, why don't you fuck off? ... substantive assertion added at 15:37, 29 March 2007 by the IP, rhetorical question added at 16:38, 31 March 2007 by the IP.

[edit] JDO

[3]: this would require source. Pavel Vozenilek 23:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Racist vandalism

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Jacob Schiff. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Wikipedia is not a place for pushing forward anti-Semitic or racist agendas, but rather a place for neutral, objective and factual information. If you cannot contribute in a constructive manner, please do not contribute at all. I see that this is your third warning of a sort; if I see your IP associated with a racist comment again, I will take action to ban you. Have a nice day.

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning LordAmeth 10:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Fuck off. The fact that you don't like the truth doesn't make it vandalism. And everything posted is well sourced. ... added at 15:37, 29 March 2007 by the IP

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

Again, maybe you didn't read the introduction. Fuck you, fuck Wikipedia's policies, and fuck off. ... added at 16:37, 31 March 2007 by the IP

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. I have no patience for your bullshit, and neither do most other editors & admins here. Wikipedia is a project for those who wish to be cooperative and productive, not for dicking around, cursing, and general disrespectful behavior. LordAmeth 23:49, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

[Incoherent and possibly offensive comments by the IP (here, if anyone is interested]) removed.]

[edit] Break time!

The user of this IP appears to be tired and emotional. He (or conceivably she) needs a break, and has got one.

[edit] An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 14:17, 23 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] 3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you. -Will Beback · † · 22:17, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Again, not me. Multiple people. Grow up, asshole.

[edit] Warning

This personal attack you made is unacceptable. Please review our conduct policies. Thank you. Crum375 00:31, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Leonard Pitts, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Shoessss 17:41, 8 June 2007 (UTC)


Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Shoessss 17:44, 8 June 2007 (UTC)


You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Antandrus (talk) 17:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Forced prostitution in German armed forces

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --Kylohk 18:12, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Joseph Tommasi. As a member of the Wikipedia community, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information of living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article must include proper sources. Thank you. Brianga 01:17, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to 5th SS Panzergrenadier Division Wiking. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Brianga 01:19, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Bill White (neo-Nazi), you will be blocked from editing. Brianga 01:21, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edit to Nigerian American (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. For future editing tests use the sandbox. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 02:11, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] re Shooting editors

Shall we start with you? Paul B 16:42, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] PROD

[edit] Erica Hardwick

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Erica Hardwick, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Erica Hardwick. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 07:54, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Marc Moran

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Marc Moran, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 00:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)