User talk:67.166.122.233

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi. Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages. Typing four tildes after your comment ( ~~~~ ) will insert a signature showing your username and a date/time stamp, which makes it clear who said what, and when. Thank you.  :) -- Perfecto 03:22, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] TV.com is one giant ad

If it is, be bold, go ahead and edit it into a neutral point of view. I can assure you that AfD is never permanent. If your plans at TVrage come to fruition, and I know you guys work hard at it, soon the article will be restored. -- Perfecto 05:32, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

  • JQP- I have a name, but I rarely use it. And I really don't see a point in adding info if it's going to be removed now. And now that I've toned it down and made it more neutral, how do I know it will stay up? Seems to me members from TV.com are pushing to have us removed as a spam site. How the hell are we a spam site? We make no money! It makes no sense. Honeslty, you know that info gets added here all the time without objection, that's even less notable than our corner of the net. We're being railroaded. Remember "Mr. Smith Goes To Washington"? The kids who printed the truth on small newspapers, only to be hammered out by the big boys? I feel like I'm driving the little go cart and we're about to get nailed by the papertruck. I honestly think there would have been no problems with us being here if they hadn't decided to complain to you. And I know they are, because they even gloated in their forum. You know we've got a damn good thing going which many respond to. Why do we have to go through this mess? Especially when we're being called a spam site be people who either haven't checked us out, refuse to, or have passed judgement because they were told to say "Spam." It genuinely feels like we're being pegged as some porno site looking for a quick buck. And if you could, please put some kind of block up from having TVrage removed from their portion of the wikipedia page. We're not deleted yet.

Well, best of luck to you. I do not appreciate your tone: "I find it very cheap and pathetic that you've allowed people to delete TvRage.com from ALL aspects of Wikipedia in general." I have been cordial and civil with you throughout. You are rude. Monitoring your site's mentions within Wikipedia's 2,406,340 articles is neither my care nor my job. Please do not come to my User or Talk page ever again. -- Perfecto 17:54, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Snide from cnet

Well, I don't need to call your bluff, since you deleted my vote, and I'm certainly not snide from cnet. If he is a sock puppet as you say, you should still not delete votes, but label them as sock puppets. What you have to remember that whether or not your site is not for profit has nothing at all to do with this VfD. The question is whether it meets the requirements on WP:WEB. If there are lots of sock puppets voting, rest assured that their votes will be discounted. Jacoplane 02:16, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

No offense, but TV.com doesn't belong here either if you're going to go by numbers. TV.com's numbers are based around popularity of a shut down site, and by force of members having to use it through CNET's services. If the site had started cold, with no links from TVTome, no membership tie-ins from places like GameStop and MP3.com, and effectivly becoming the ONLY TV related site ont he net for two months, thet'd be in the dumps too. If all you're going to do is base whether or not websites can stay or not on numbers, you might want to start taking down more than just TVrage.

FWIW, you're free to nominate TV.com for deletion. Yes, you don't need to register for an account even for this. See Wikipedia:Guide to deletion for the procedure. (FWIW, I promise not to comment or vote.) -- Perfecto 02:35, 14 December 2005 (UTC)