User talk:67.160.192.42

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Regarding this edit

Template:Civility -GTBacchus(talk) 07:28, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Section blanking

I have undone your blanking of sections that you did not like. It made the article considerably more biased, which is in violation with wikipedia's rules on neutral point of view. Kim van der Linde at venus 19:44, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

It might not have been your intent, but you recently removed content from AIDS reappraisal. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. mboverload@ 08:16, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to AIDS reappraisal. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. mboverload@ 08:22, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tone down

If you continue to deal with other editors the way you are currently doing, I see a lot of frustration coming your way. That might be your choice, but you cannot claim ownership to an article as you currently try to do. If you want that something remains in an article, I suggest you back it up with verifiable and reliable sources. Wikipedia is not the place for activism and you will encounter over and over again that statements that are percieved as activist opinion will be deleted on sight. Just my 0.02 cents. Kim van der Linde at venus 18:08, 21 May 2006 (UTC)