User talk:66.214.118.69

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Your edits to University of California, Riverside

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Baseball,Baby! balls•strikes 23:37, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from University of California, Riverside. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. TigerShark 21:53, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thanks, Insert-Belltower 14:32, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm going to have to report you if you don't stop making unjustified text removals from the UC Riverside article. This is the last warning. Insert-Belltower 21:24, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you. UCRGrad 21:59, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Blanking your user talkpage is vandalism too. Picaroon9288 02:37, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Naconkantari 02:55, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:66.214.118.69. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. TBCTaLk?!? 03:01, 13 July 2006 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Johann Wolfgang 03:45, 15 July 2006 (UTC)


I assure you, if you read the talk page and what's going on with this page, you will see my sources are up to date and from accurate sources. I am REMOVING the vandalism. 66.214.118.69 03:47, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on a page. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. Naconkantari 03:49, 15 July 2006 (UTC)


If my edits weren't reverted without any explanation, I wouldn't have had to do it three times. No one has even discussed anything with me. 66.214.118.69 03:53, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

 You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

Naconkantari 03:54, 15 July 2006 (UTC)


In the talk section of the UCR page, I clearly asked for help and discussion. UCRGrad is the only person I said I would not speak with, simply because he/she is an antagonist and causes too many issues that no one wants to deal with. I apologize if this wasn't clear, but I thought it was. 66.214.118.69 03:56, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

While I agree that UCRGrad is being a bit of a nuisance, you can be banned temporarily for WP:3rr even if you're in the right. Arguing about silly things like the landscape of Riverside is not going to help. I suggest that when the ban lifts, you register an account (it's really easy) and continue the debate on the talk page. There's an RfC going on for the article, so hopefully it gets a little more civil in the future. Cheers. Danny Lilithborne 04:03, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop reverting the page. As I said above, you can be banned for violating the three-revert rule even if you're in the right. Danny Lilithborne 00:11, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] a7X

Hi, I notice you've revently thrown in an opinion on the member pages for A7X. It'd be helpful if you threw your comment in at the discussion here. Thanks! HawkerTyphoon 23:01, 3 August 2006 (UTC)


Sure thing, thanks for letting me know about it. 66.214.118.69 23:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Biomed

Where are the 1 and 2nd yr biomed classes taught now?Insert-Belltower 11:53, 26 August 2006 (UTC)