User talk:65.80.29.189

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Regarding your unsigned comment at Talk: Benazir Bhutto

Wikipedia English is a product that hopes to assemble sourced facts and develop an objective review of topics of the world. For the article you commented on above, I am only seeking to ensure the objective point of view is established by removing such sensationalized reporting such as "bloody" "impassionate" "cheered" etc. Only the facts stand. Should an author include an assertion with a credible source then I would not challenge that statement because I only know what is presented before me. In this way is Wikipedia a unique and vibrant product because it encourages those who have no personal knowledge of a subject to become better at communicating it to other people based on the evidence at hand. I would dare say this makes Wikipedia good and better than any other Wiki which mercilessly allows edit-wars to continue on end with no middle ground. The best mediator in any argument or viewpoint is the one not involved and unrelated. Think of it as the articles I am most familiar with I RARELY edit because I know that I am passionate about them and don't see the facts as they are presented. I have a slanted opinion in that sense and how I portray them will be how I wish them to be portrayed as opposed to what is actually accepted, published, sourced, verified, and in consensus with. I invite you to learn more about Wikipedia by participating and understand the role of an objective viewer. Thank you! .:DavuMaya:. 01:20, 20 October 2007 (UTC)