User talk:65.164.51.130

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] 29 December 2006

Don't remove the {{db-bio}} template from the William James (Bill) Foran again. It certainly looks like this is your article written about you, and as such, is eligible for speedy deletion.

Atlant 18:04, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nonsense edit in Highland Park High School (University Park, Texas)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Highland Park High School (University Park, Texas). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. LeyteWolfer 06:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Yamla 22:56, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lindsay Lohan

Sorry, but your edit has been removed. No one has accused anyone of "reckless" anything at this point (WP:NPOV violation) and, since one side said she hit him and the other said he jumped on her hood, any statement of either is original research. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 17:30, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Simply not true... try reading the cited reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.164.51.130 (talk • contribs)
I did; did you? RadioKirk (u|t|c) 18:53, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

You changed it to one you like better, read the real one and maybe even watch video of the event. There's no original research about that I'm citing a clearly factual article. 65.164.51.130 18:59, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Check your edits; your first was reverted due to biased writing (you stated "wreckless" [sic] as a fact, not as an accusation) while your second failed to include a source. Your accusation of bias against me is patently false. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 19:10, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
I removed the {{NPOV}} tag because the passage was rewritten slightly to reflect the link you actually remembered to include. The tag is inaccurate. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 19:33, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Not for you to judge. 65.164.51.130 19:43, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Is too, Bill Foran; you've been exposed. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 19:52, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Yamla 20:05, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I'm confused all I did was add a legitimate story to a page, how is this a problem? All my other violations are months old and the blocks have expired on those for a reason, they're not supposed to pop up every time I make a real edit from now on."

Decline reason: "Per above and below. – Steel 14:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

You're an established hoaxer who used his own edits in an effort to paint me as biased, intentionally avoiding any discussion over my correct (WP:NPOV violation) removal (no WP:RS) of your edits and instead moving straight into confrontational edits, the second of which was a clear violation of WP:POINT (I performed a minor rewrite to conform to your cited source). Your purpose on Lindsay Lohan and its talk page is to confront, not to improve the article. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 21:03, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Not true, the problem is you're trying to run a fan page by editing every edit on the page so that it is as positive as possible within Wiki-rules and got mad that I added a story that could be interpreted as an indictment of Lindsay's charachter. 65.164.51.130 21:10, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Utterly false (and another violation of WP:NPA) and you know it. My "job" with Lindsay Lohan and every other article to which I contribute is to write neither a fan page nor a hit piece, but an encyclopedia article. Your first edit turned accusations into "facts" and was correctly removed per WP:NPOV; your second, whether through carelessness on your part or in an intentional effort to get reverted, was correctly removed per WP:ATT. Your third stood, and was rewritten to accurately reflect the report and the video (which makes clear neither whether the paparazzo was already there or jumped in front of the car nor who drove the car being chased). You made no effort to engage me in conversation , deciding instead to violate WP:NPA and WP:POINT in an effort to further this argument that the WP:NPOV violation was somehow mine. The one fact that remains is, you've exposed yourself instead. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 21:41, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

ok