User talk:65.139.80.23

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please pay attention to the three-revert rule; if you continue to ignore it you may be banned or blocked. -- Antaeus Feldspar 05:15, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

--- Look , my request is that you stop trying to censure information that is meant for the reader. Why do you not let the reader form their own opinion ??? The whole idea of Wikipedia is to spread knowledge , not bury it. If you have some positive contributions to make then do so by adding your own 2 cents in the article. Anyone is allowed to edit Wikipedia thanks.

The common misconception is that "anyone is allowed to edit Wikipedia" for any purpose whatsoever, including original research and advocacy. The purpose of Wikipedia is not to spread "knowledge", it is to spread confirmed, verified knowledge. Your personal opinion that quantum mechanics can be interpreted as confirmation of Hubbard's theories is just that: your personal opinion. I understand that you would prefer if Wikipedia let you advance any idea, no matter how speculative, and forbade anyone else from removing it. However, the fact is that advancing speculative theories is not the purpose for which Wikipedia allows people freedom in editing; the articles are not there for everyone to add "their own 2 cents" but to bring each article closer to a factual, neutral examination of the subject at hand. It is whether it brings the article closer to that state which determines a "positive contribution" -- it is definitely not the case that all addition of more words to an article is a "contribution" and all removals of words are "censure" [sic] of information. -- Antaeus Feldspar 06:29, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Three revert rule

You have been blocked for 24 hours under the three revert rule. If you wish to appeal please contact another administrator or the mailing list.Geni 09:54, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)