User talk:64.66.70.18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Civility

Please observe the standards of this project in the area of civil dealings with each other, particularly the assumption of good faith. Certain of your edits, as well as your persistent postings to User Talk:Orlady, seem to me to be verging on violations of these norms here. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

The schools in question are matters of massive indifference to me. My judgment as an experienced editor and admin is 1) that they are notable; and 2) that you are verging on harassment of Orlady and myself. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:41, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
The tags say "You show how they are notable in the talk pages." As an "admin" you would know such, as for harassment, you seem to have little understanding of the word. I attempted to start a dialog over the edits you reversed, the fact that you want to have a page war makes it clear you are the one interested in harassment. You are the one that isn't following the rules. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.66.70.18 (talk • contribs)

Wow! All I did was remove the templates from a couple of articles that had been challenged for notability in spite of contents that clearly establish notability... I am glad to see (on User talk:Orangemike) that you are now aware of the documentation regarding WP:Notability. I hope that this means there will be no more re-adding of notability templates to articles that don't deserve them. If you intend to stay involved with Wikipedia, I suggest that you become a registered user and become acquainted with the various guidelines and policies here, starting with these:

Also, if you want to be respected around here, I suggest that you refrain from deleting warning messages from your talk page. --Orlady (talk) 00:57, 30 November 2007 (UTC)