User talk:64.25.210.131

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. -- Alf melmac 14:52, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning for editing First Canadian Centre (diff). The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // MartinBot 13:24, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Ed (Edgar181) 13:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC)


Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Electrolyte. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -SpuriousQ (talk) 14:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Electrolyte, you will be blocked from editing. -SpuriousQ (talk) 14:33, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Vsmith 18:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] September 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Submarine. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.- Gilliam 15:13, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Submarine, you will be blocked from editing. — Nivix talk 15:14, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Red supergiant, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 16:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Vandalism to Red supergiant

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Red supergiant, you will be blocked from editing. Your changes have been automatically reverted by CounterVandalismBot. If this is a mistake, please report it. Thank you. CounterVandalismBot 16:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Red supergiant, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mumia-w-18 17:00, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Middlebury Union Middle School, you will be blocked from editing. JNW (talk) 16:03, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Yu the Great. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Cobi(t|c|b) 19:06, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Shang Dynasty, you will be blocked from editing. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 19:08, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Snowolf How can I help? 19:30, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] January 2008

Your recent edit to Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 14:11, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to William Cooley (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 14:57, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Photographer has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Waggers (talk) 14:49, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Demographics of Mexico (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 18:13, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Middlebury, Vermont constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. · AndonicO Hail! 19:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Philadelphia Experiment. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. · AndonicO Hail! 19:29, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Philadelphia Experiment. · AndonicO Hail! 19:31, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. When the block expires you are free to continue editing if you intend to make useful contributions. However, if you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, this IP address will be subject to a longer block.

NawlinWiki (talk) 19:55, 19 February 2008 (UTC)