User talk:64.22.92.56

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This IP address has been blocked because it is believed to be an open proxy or zombie computer. To prevent abuse, these proxies may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If your ISP has misconfigured its proxy, you can try bypassing it by logging into Wikimedia's secure gateway at https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/. For more information about open proxies and what you can do, please see the WikiProject on open proxies.

[edit] July 2007

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:SchuminWeb may be offensive or unwelcome. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Insanity Incarnate 06:38, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Trott curve, you will be blocked from editing. Recurring dreams 07:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tom Green, you will be blocked from editing. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 03:25, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Infrogmation/Personal info, you will be blocked from editing. Oxymoron83 22:48, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 1 week. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.Infrogmation 22:50, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edits to Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event:

Your recent edit to Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 04:10, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:SchuminWeb. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. J. Spencer 04:20, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

. dave souza, talk 04:24, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Been blocked long ago, possibly due to abuse. Since it's been a long time I am requesting an unblock as the new owner. Unable to create account or edit"

Decline reason: "This is still an open proxy. Wikipedia policy is to not allow open proxies. — -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:17, 16 August 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "The ban on open proxies is too extreme, implying everyone who uses an open proxy will abuse the site. I can't edit even when logged in. If you thought for a minute that the purpose is to allow editing where the site itself is blocked by a firewall then you wouldn't assume abuse"

Decline reason: "It's not that we believe everyone who uses open proxies is abusive, but rather that by nature, open proxies are dangerous tools to those who do act abusively -- given the sorts of very persistent troublemakers Wikipedia is prone to attracting, this isn't a vulnerability we can really accept. Policy and technical changes are hopefully in the works, to allow a better solution to the problem, but until then, this is really a security hole. Sorry. – Luna Santin (talk) 10:32, 19 August 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Is it possible to block this IP as anon only and allow legit users to log in while also blocking account creation from this IP? After all, you do block "anon only" for TOR proxies."

Decline reason: "No TOR nodes are usually hard blocked. This is also what Yamla told you three weeks ago. — Pascal.Tesson 04:22, 11 September 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Per This discussion. Not everyone agrees that fully blocking proxies is a good idea."

Decline reason: "However, they're still not allowed, per This policy. SQL(Query Me!) 11:32, 15 October 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "How do we get permission to edit, especially from services that block access to Wikipedia?"

Decline reason: "Unfortunately, due to the amount a=of abuse coming from open proxies (again, we do not restrict editing for fun, but there has been some naughty abuse), the current consensus is to disallow all editing (logged in and anonymous) from these access points. The only advice I can give you is not to use these to access Wikipedia. If you are logged in, a very limited amount of people have access to the server logs (to fight abuse), and your privacy shouldn't be affected much. We take privacy very seriously. -- lucasbfr talk 15:53, 25 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.