User talk:64.136.26.201

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Your edit to MSB FTW

Your recent edit to MSB FTW (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 17:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Definition, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Definition was changed by 64.136.26.201 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-01-29T14:07:37+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page William Kelly (inventor) do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bexample\.com' .
Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 15:37, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

[edit] Pamlico 140

Hi! Your recent edit to the Pamlico 140 page was mistaken - the article isn't blocked, but has been tagged for conflict of interest. The user User talk:Pamlico 140 has been blocked, though, so perhaps that was the reason for your error? - Bilby (talk) 02:28, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Based on your comments I've removed the conflict of interest tag. - Bilby (talk) 02:38, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
  • You recently reverted the Pamlico 140 page to an earlier version - this was, I suspect, an error, as the version you reverted from was simply a correction of spelling errors and had removed some broken links. Please check to see if an edit needs reverting before doing so. It is probably also worth mentioning, in light of the earlier comment, that User:Pamlico 140 has been unblocked and can log in with that account now. - Bilby (talk) 02:39, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Again, reverting back to an earlier version of the page is problematic - the earlier version you are reverting to has the same content, but with broken images and the occasional spelling or punctuation error. I've undone your revert, and you're more than welcome to edit, but it would work a bit smoother if you could edit what is there, rather than reverting. - Bilby (talk) 02:36, 10 June 2008 (UTC)