User talk:64.110.244.76

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Suki

Hi. I notice that you are adding a link to a religious organization at the article entitled Suki. That article is a disambiguation page, which lists articles or subjects with similar names, so that one can find the particular "Suki" that one is searching for. Your entry, however, does not point to an article, and should not be included. If there are reliable sources that show that the organization is notable, then an article may be justified - and, with an article, a link on this page would not be unreasonable. With no article, though, the entry should not be re-added. Thanks, ZZ Claims ~ Evidence 04:49, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Brad Wall, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. -Royalguard11(T·R!) 03:48, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Number 1, there is no consensus on the talk page about anything, and the story is sourced. Second, the external links I removed were nothing more than party propaganda or otherwise irrelevant. If they are to be included, they need to be talked about in the article, as Wikipedia is not a soapbox, or a directory of external links. -Royalguard11(T·R!) 02:07, 28 December 2007 (UTC)