User talk:63.216.113.163

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Apologies. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 (talk) 23:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

No, for several reasons. One is that you could do it yourself. Another is that it's important to assume good faith, and I find it significantly more likely that that user is simply unfamiliar with how to do things on Wikipedia. The third reason is that I'd have to report you too, for edit warring. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 (talk) 23:24, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
In that case you are on your own. Please sign your contributions to talk pages. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 (talk) 23:30, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button Image:Signature_icon.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 23:23, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Johannes Avetaranian has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Redfarmer (talk) 23:42, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Wafa Sultan, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --148.87.13.9 (talk) 23:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Note I've semi-protected the article because of this edit-warring. The source looks more like a blog or an editorial and thus not constitute as a real reliable source. Obviously, the Jerusalem Post (and I think I've also saw the New York Post) is a more reliable source, so I think it has been protected at the correct version.--JForget 23:58, 6 June 2008 (UTC)