User talk:63.215.27.211

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for experimenting with the page Smallpox on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Krellis 21:30, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Theodore Roosevelt, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. IronDuke 22:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Jonathannew7. If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Plek 23:57, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Kylie Minogue, you will be blocked from editing. --Plek 20:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism, spam, deliberate misinformation, personal attacks, and other forms of disruption will not be tolerated.Kafziel Talk 21:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Regarding your edit to Kylie Minogue

Could you please stop repeatedly adding back extraneous category tags to the Kylie Minogue article, without discussing this edit first on the talk page? A consensus has been reached previously: Talk:Kylie Minogue#Category cleanup. Please state your rationale there and achieve consensus first, per Wikipedia policy. Also, please provide an edit summary when making changes to an article. I have reverted your edit, pending discussion on the talk page. Thank you. --Plek 17:35, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Again, your edits are contested. This means that you must discuss them on the talk page first to achieve consensus. This is has now been said to you (and your other sockpuppet accounts) many times. Consider this your final warning. --Plek 05:50, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nick at Nite

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Caldorwards4 02:23, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Issue raised on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Hello. As a result of your repeated deletion of discussion on Talk:Kylie Minogue, your account and its alleged sockpuppets have now been reported at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:JJonathan and socks at Talk:Kylie Minogue. You are invited to explain your actions there. Thanks. --Plek 22:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)


You have been blocked from editing for 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continued talk page vandalism under this IP and others. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Kuru talk 23:39, 20 March 2007 (UTC)



Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Chalk. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kuru talk 03:53, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Solange Knowles, you will be blocked from editing. Keilana 01:53, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Richmond Hill, Queens, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Richmond Hill, Queens was changed by 63.215.27.211 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-03T23:38:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:38, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Saint Joseph. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Chenzw (talk · contribs) 03:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Talk:Popsicle has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 22:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)