User talk:63.164.47.2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  • Note: this computer is registered to Palace Station, but it is not clear whether it is shared.

Contents

[edit] June 2006

  • Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Danny Lilithborne 00:17, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

Your recent edit to Retailing (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 21:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cireshoe 07:03, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Thanks for experimenting with the page Fred Rogers on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Kolindigo 04:44, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Garfield, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Powers T 13:09, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from User talk:63.164.47.2. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JForget 01:45, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Richard Pryor, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Escape Orbit (Talk) 01:46, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:63.164.47.2, you will be blocked from editing. Alexfusco5 01:46, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated.JForget 01:49, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

There is a problem with this computer and it keep wiping out all this stuff, none of this is intentional. Sorry for any problems. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CMacMillan (talk • contribs) 01:42, 25 November 2007 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:63.164.47.2. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 23:50, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Garfield worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. utcursch | talk 08:05, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to I Love Lucy, you will be blocked from editing. Weathermandan (talk) 08:05, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Christopher Boykin, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Christopher Boykin was changed by 63.164.47.2 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-14T04:52:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 04:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Ray J. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Nn123645 (talk) 05:03, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.

If this IP is actually shared, please have your network administrator send me an e-mail. --Nlu (talk) 04:44, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to America's Best Dance Crew. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Reorion (talk) 06:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Joe Jackson (musician). Calabraxthis (talk) 07:20, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism, spam, deliberate misinformation, personal attacks, and other forms of disruption will not be tolerated. Kafziel Complaint Department 07:36, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to North Dakota. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AlexiusHoratius (talk) 05:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC)


Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cincinatti Reds, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dustitalk to me 18:53, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to House Mouse has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. - ✰ALLST☆R✰ echo 07:01, 29 May 2008 (UTC)