User talk:62.85.192.81

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Continued vandalism on Ellie Caulkins Opera House article, 4 May 2007

The vandalism continues.....

All this "self promotion" nonsense.

Why doesn't this editor decide to produce some useful text if he is so incensed about what he sees? He cannot simply continue to remove legitimate copy without consensus.'

Viva-Verdi 03:19, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

[edit] Clearly, what we have here is pure vandalism on the Electronic libretto page, 1 feb 2007 and several times beyond

More of this nonsense. No explanation, nothing on Talk page. Viva-Verdi 17:17, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Why remove an entire chunk of text from an article without any explanations? REFER TO THE TALK PAGE BEING DOING THIS PLEASE. Viva-Verdi 19:57, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

What is the matter with you and WHY are you removing this material?? THIS TALK PAGE is where you should justify any changes of this sort. Viva-Verdi 18:08, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Electronic libretto. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kyra~(talk) 07:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC)


YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED ENOUGH TIMES. Viva-Verdi 15:17, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. alphachimp 16:15, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] MORE OF SAME NONSENSE - 2 March

So, they've unblocked you, and 5 minutes later, it more of the same bloody thing on electronic libretto. Viva-Verdi 18:02, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

[edit] 5 March 2007 Electronic libretto

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Electronic libretto, you will be blocked from editing. - Microtony 10:15, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

James086Talk 22:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] CONSENSUS FROM EDITORS THAT REVERTED COPY ON Electronic libretto IS NECESSARY

I have reverted the latest deletion from this article with the following note: "This is NOT publicity but a history of the evoution and spread of the system. IT IS CLEARLY SUPPORTED BY MANY OTHER EDITORS"

At last, 62.85.192.81, you seem to justify your actions by including the words "removed publicity". This is the first time that you have provided a justification for your actions but, given the number of editors who have reverted your removal of what is clearly seen as important copy, THERE IS A CONSENSUS that this material is valid.

Therefore, 62.85.192.81, LOOK AT THIS HISTORY of the reverts of your text removal and you will see that I AM NOT ALONE. You have ast least 3 editors who support my position.

If you would like to use the TALK PAGE to present an arguement for the removal of this text, we shall all weigh in and establish a consensus (although I would argue that a consensus already exists).

Viva-Verdi 15:19, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] March 2007

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Electronic libretto, you will be blocked from editing. - Microtony 16:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. alphachimp 18:28, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] viva-verdi user

viva verdi is still using wikipedia to self promote figaro system company.

Whoever the hell you are, I have nothing to do with Figaro Systems. This is NOT self promotion. And I did not write the text you have removed; check "History" and you'll see. Viva-Verdi 12:40, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Please read the Talk page of the Ellie Caulkins Opera House article where you see my referecnes to your behaviour and, subsequently, your being blocking for constant reverts which were opposed by a consensus of editors.
This is NO DIFFERENT. I am posting your last warning and shall contact an appropriate Wiki moderator on this.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

SEE THE TALK PAGE OF THE ARTICLE FOR ANOTHER EDITOR'S SUPPORT OF THIS POSITION.

You have have 2 editors in SUPPORT of including the material, so DO NOT keep reverting. Viva-Verdi 16:31, 7 May 2007 (UTC)