User talk:62.3.70.68

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Greetings Are you employed by Intel? I would like to invite you to read the WP:NPOV policy. Thank you. Mineralè 18:28, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

No I don't work for Intel. I just read articles and object to Vivv being slated as DRM in a chip just because you/others are angry at Intel or anti-DRM. The choice of DRM is the content providers not Viiv. Viiv just enables content to remain protected. If you want to download divx via bittorrent on it then you can - I think this should be made clear if we are going to have a balanced article 62.3.70.68 19:34, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

You sould take note of the article you pointed me to. "In many cases, yes. Many of us believe that the fact that some text is biased is not enough, in itself, to delete it outright. If it contains valid information, the text should simply be edited accordingly." I aim to stop people deleting stuff that doesn't match their angry anti-drm bias. I fully 100% support DRM because I am a musician as feel I should be the one that controls licencing and what I think is fair use of my work 62.3.70.68 22:17, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR

Not Commenting on the issue (Not because of neutrality but because i just don't have time to)

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.

I am giving this warning to both of you in order to be fair even though I do believe only one of you deserve it

--E-Bod 06:02, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

OK I actually read the edit. Before I was just commenting that nether of you should have reverted more than once. Both of you actually reverted only once so you haven't Violated the 3RR but the 3RR does not entitle you to 3 reverts its just says don't get into an edit war and if you do we put the cutoff at 3. I had striked the warning on the other user because when i quickly glanced it looked like a few people reverted your edits but not I see that only one person reverted your edits. so it isn't as one sided an issue as i though. I will make both your warnings equlual but that's besides the point the message is to each of you individually. just because the other person reverts more than you doesn't mean you can revert an equal amount and be OK. Now and I can't even see the difference between. Mineralè should use the page's talk page.

And Just for the heck of it. My suggestion is to Have one section explaining the POV of why it is good and another section explaining the POV why it is bad. If you want you can make it in the a sub page like Viiv/Sandbox and after you both agree on something include it in the article. regardless of which edit is better nether of you should have reverted more than once. You guess didn't revert several times in one day so my warning was premature. But Just for that reason Don't keep reverting. The better article isnt't the one with the most dedicated revert it is the one that the users compromise one. With lots of Conflicting POV's the articles will balance into a NPOV article. Remember this is just a Silly wikipidia article.--E-Bod 22:48, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Register

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to sign your posts and comments with four tildes (~~~~), which will let others know who left it. --E-Bod 06:05, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

You will be taken more seriously if you register. It is against policy to discriminate against IP addresses but is is practiced anyway--E-Bod 06:05, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Have you registered yet. I don't know why you wouldn't want to. You don't have to but really. Why not--E-Bod 22:56, 8 May 2006 (UTC)