User talk:59.176.106.168

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Team Gizka

I've nominated this page for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Gizka (2nd nomination) since it is unsourced, reads like an advertisements, and engages in crystal-ballery. Your input at the AfD, and/or in improving the article, is welcome. --EEMeltonIV 06:30, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] KOTOR 2

Please familiarize yourself with WP:RS and WP:FICT. Lacking cited and reliable sources to substantiate the significance of Team Gizka's work, it is a non-notable vanity addition to the KOTOR2 article. Also, I have made a good-faith effort to explain this on the talk page, yet you reverted my edit without responding; this is rude, and not a sign of good-faith editing. Are you involved with Team Gizka? You might examine the conflict-of-interest material. --EEMeltonIV 20:09, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Adding a couple of lines about other mods still does not address any of the other concerns. Please take the time to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies, and then abide by them. --EEMeltonIV 21:06, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment on my talk page. Do you have anything to say in terms of the salient issue of the project's lack of notability and reliable sources? Liking something or thinking it's neat is not a reason to include it in Wikipedia. While you may disagree with the deletion of the team's page, keep in mind that there was a consensus among other editors to delete it. I'll again ask that you read through Wikipedia's most basic policies requiring verifiability, reliable sources, and [[WP:NOR|no original research]. The content you're adding about the mod. is not verified by reliable sources. --EEMeltonIV 21:33, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. The content you want to add has been deleted via AFD twice and salted, indicating that it is not currently considered appropriate content for Wikipedia. If you have new references from reliable independent sources to establish Team Gizka's notability, please make a note of it on the article's talk page.
Also, please note that Wikipedia has a policy against performing more than three reverts, in whole or in part, on a single page within a 24-hour period. A revert means undoing the actions of another editor, whether involving the same or different material each time (see WP:3RR). Please consider joining the discussion on the talk page instead of reinserting unsourced contentious material. --Muchness 23:18, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic II: The Sith Lords‎. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Muchness 23:55, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at [[:at Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic II: The Sith Lords. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Haemo 01:35, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.