44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| 44 Liquormart Inc. v. Rhode Island | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court of the United States | ||||||||||
| Argued November 1, 1995 Decided May 13, 1996 |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| Holding | ||||||||||
| ... | ||||||||||
| Court membership | ||||||||||
| Chief Justice: William Rehnquist Associate Justices: John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer |
||||||||||
| Case opinions | ||||||||||
| Majority by: Stevens Joined by: Rehnquist, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer Concurrence by: O'Connor Joined by: Rehnquist, Souter, Breyer Concurrence by: Scalia Concurrence by: Thomas |
||||||||||
| Laws applied | ||||||||||
| ... | ||||||||||
44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island, 517 U.S. 484 (1996), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that ...
Contents |
[edit] Background
[edit] The decision
[edit] References
The Oyez Project, 44 Liquormart v. Rhode Island, 517 U.S. 484 (1996). Last viewed April 23, 2008.
O'Brien, David M. Constitutional Law and Politics. Vol. II: Civil Rights and Civil Liberties 6th ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2005. Pages 564-572.

