Talk:.38 S&W

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces (general topics): Military technology and engineering task force Weaponry task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): British military history task force United States military history task force

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Firearms; If you would like to join us, please visit the project page where you can find a list of open tasks. If you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked

On June 3, this article was nominated for deletion. The discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/.38 S&W. The result was keep. Xezbeth 19:44, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Merged .38/200

I merged .38/200 into this article, since that is properly just a variant of this. The end result is a fuller article about one actual cartridge. It's still a bit messy, it'd be good to clean it up in the post-merge era. Arthurrh

[edit] WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Article reassessed and graded as start class. Referencing, appropriate inline citation guidelines not met. --dashiellx (talk) 12:09, 24 April 2008 (UTC)