User talk:24.91.94.125

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Your edit to Zerg

Your recent edit to Zerg (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 02:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content, as you did to User talk:24.91.94.125. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Hu12 02:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank pages, as you did to User talk:24.91.94.125, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Hu12 02:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC

[edit] Why remove messages?

Simply I think there rather private messages that arn't very worthy of being featured in an encyclopedia.I mean why the fuck should a private message/warning be not removed?Wikipedia isn't a chat discussion fools.I rather suggest a an actual wikiproject with private messages.Now I know there are dicussions are for editing help but for warnings seriously?I don't agree that removing a message is vandalism.It's a simple PERSONAL MESSAGE THATS NOT RELATED TO AN ENCYCLOPEDIA OTHER THEN USERS.And please ill be blocked for removing these?That my sir is retarded.Anyway I apperciate if you could debate me on this.Thanks Btw im still waiting a response.HELLO im still waiting zzzzzzz...UPDATE: Oh what can you not have a reason to support this?That's very poor and inexcuseable that this wasn't anwsered for a month.Im only assuming that you would use the lame blanking messages is vandalism without proof.I'll even offer you 30 days to respond to this.In no way am I going to respond on your talk page.I will leave that to yourself but if you cannot respond then I will considerbly delete these messages.Nor should messages of this kind be open to public in my humble opinion.

[edit] Stone Cold Steve Austin

We don't add the WM 23 match until AFTER the event. Announced matches that have not yet occurred do not go into articles per Wikipedia's pro wrestling project's policies and style guide. I suggest you discuss this on the article's talk page if you really feel it should be added right now, before adding it back into the article. Bmg916 Speak to Me 16:50, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] New England Patriots

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to New England Patriots. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Deor 16:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)