User talk:24.5.120.23

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1. One cannot conclude that evangelization is open to interpretation just because hindu scriptures are eseentially silent on the issue of religious conversion. This reasoning is biased. Since when did Hindu's start evangelizing?

2. Given that the commonly held concept that "one must be born a hindu to be a hindu" is not at all touched upon in the description again shows the same bias. At least discuss opposing viewpoints.

3. Where possible it should be clearly articulated whether a specific viewpoint regarding conversion is a reformist viewpoint, an orthodox viewpoint, or a mainstream viewpoint.

You don't necessarily have to take my changes, but clearly this section is far from accurate and needs to be expanded upon to include and discuss commonly held views.