User talk:24.4.25.168

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This host, c-24-4-25-168.hsd1.ca.comcast.net, is registered to Comcast Communications in or near Pleasanton, California, an Internet service provider through which numerous individual users may connect to the Internet via proxy. This IP address may be reassigned to a different person when the current user disconnects.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.


Contents

[edit] Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been deleted, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

[edit] May 2007

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "CheeseMan82". The reason given for CheeseMan82's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

  • Decline reason:

Doesn't appear to be a shared or widely shared IP address, which in turn makes it seem likely you may be the same person. If you are a legitimate editor, this autoblock should expire in about 24 hours. Sorry. – Luna Santin (talk) 01:17, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "CheeseMan82". The reason given for CheeseMan82's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

  • Decline reason:

As per Luna Santin. — Yamla 01:51, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't get what you mean by "the same person". Who are you referring to?

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:The Hooded One, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  The Hooded One  ♠  01:35, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Pikminlover". The reason given for Pikminlover's block is: "Vandalism after block".

  • Decline reason:

This IP seems to be used by vandals, so I'm inclined to keep it blocked. — Metros 20:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Captain Wikify Argh! 00:51, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Astrale01. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Astrale01talkcontribs 03:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC)


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Portal:Water, you will be blocked from editing. James, La gloria è a dio 23:07, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I am not a sockpuppet farm! As you can see here, User:Megadude9 was created by Coolman882 himself. This IP does not make sockpuppets, big deal one was used on it. (The autoblock has already expired, too). 24.4.25.168 01:17, 13 June 2007 (UTC)"

Decline reason: "Blocked for unblock abuse and continued vandalism. Do not abuse the unblock template. — Yamla 02:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "So, I am not a sockpuppet farm? If so, please anon-only block me (I am not a lone IP address). 24.4.25.168 00:30, 14 June 2007 (UTC)"

Decline reason: "I've extended the block on this IP address -- it will block all users on this address, and will last for one month. The number of abusive accounts from this address, which appears both non-dynamic and non-shared, is unusually high, and no established user has linked themselves to this IP. Should an established editor link themselves to this IP address, I may reconsider or reconfigure the block, but until such time, please send any explanations or appeals to unblock-en-l, as I'm going to protect this talk page. Thank you for your time. – Luna Santin (talk) 00:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] November 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Esta Spalding. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 00:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ed. J. Davenport, you will be blocked from editing. Icestorm815 (talk) 00:19, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Oxymoron83, you will be blocked from editing. --Oxymoron83 00:20, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 1 week from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —Animum (talk) 00:23, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "YA don't know who I am?"

Decline reason: "Nope. :) — krimpet⟲ 00:37, 27 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This appears to be yet another sock of Pikminlover, along with FooBarZap.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 00:30, 27 November 2007 (UTC)