User talk:24.253.46.31

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "same reason different retard admin... and hey I run the damn CVU..can't you read.."

Decline reason: "No. — The Anome (talk) 21:42, 26 December 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "the editor is mentally retarded that blocked me...I claim protection from the handicapped. please revert this erroneous block and tell him that hamas is a terrorist group and he is a terrorist-administrator. thank you for your time.. god bless.. praise jesus and anything else that will get you to revert my block by this infidel..I do not wish to be forced to take out my IP address of vengence..lol..actually I don't really care, but this post sounded fun.. off to lunch.. catch you guys later..julie...call me..you know I love you baby..smooches"

Decline reason: "No. east.718 at 19:43, 11/13/2007"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

You're not even registered, so do not lecture me about Wikipedia rules. Swisspass 22:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Yes I did delete, are we not allowed to? We'll manage it in Talk, thanks. Also I am sorry, it's just that sometimes people cause problems and I wasn't sure. Pardon me and thank you for your insight on the article. Swisspass 22:52, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Hamas page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Superm401 - Talk 22:02, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

It is incorrect to say there is a simple, objective NPOV definition of terrorist Wikipedia can use. Not everyone considers Hamas to be a terrorist organization. The article notes clearly that many governments and groups do, but it is inappropriate for Wikipedia to make its own value judgment. Superm401 - Talk 21:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Hamas, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:57, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:13, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

You have again been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. -- The Anome (talk) 21:15, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Having reviewed the history of this user page, you seem to have made a deliberately misleading edit to "award" yourself a barnstar, using another user's name [1]. This, combined with your recent edit history, and repeated bogus edit comments, gives me the impression that your main purpose in editing here currently is to cause disruption. Please desist, as the most likely outcome of continued disruptive editing is likely to be a rapid series of progressively longer blocks of this IP address. -- The Anome (talk) 21:31, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edit [2],, which is presumably a response to my edit above, and to prevent further trolling, I am delighted to oblige your request. -- The Anome (talk) 21:35, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

The unblock requests and the responses are hilarious. Also [3] Enigma (talk) 22:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)