User talk:24.239.178.19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Phil Rizzuto

Could you please re-do your edits to this article? Unfortunately, your edits were done on top of some significant vandalism and were lost when I removed the other editor's vandalism. Thanks - and sorry about the extra work. Rklawton 20:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your work and patience with all the hoo-ha on this. We've been dealing with the Ron liebman sockpuppet cavalcade since April. He goes in cycles, and this appears to be an up-one. We'll all keep an eye on the article, b/c he'll be creating more sockpuppets anytime, sadly. But keep up the good work, 'cause some of us appreciate it. You should consider maybe getting a registered named account, too (it's free). But that's up to you. :) -Ebyabe 15:56, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rizzuto’s Secret of Youth Lasted for Years

Great work! Rklawton 16:25, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Phil Rizzuto. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "<redacted>"

Decline reason: "Block is already expired. Please don't make a fuss to prove a point. Dispute resolution is open to you if you're involved in a content dispute. — Vassyana 03:16, 22 August 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Sorry, I thought I was just leaving a perky rebuttal. I didn't know I was automatically filing a request to undo nothing, which I had no interest in pursuing. Again, apologies for inadvertantly wasting your time.24.239.178.19 03:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)