User talk:24.215.227.183

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I believe that the article Slavoj Žižek contains an excessive number of external links. Wikipedia official policy states: ["There is nothing wrong with adding a list of content-relevant links to an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia."]. In the spirit of compromise I reduced the list somewhat by highlighting a general link to all of the Lacan.com articles, something you have twice reverted. The list as it stands might still be considered link farming by some people, but that is for a broader consensus than you and I to judge.

If the Zizek articles are in the public domain, you might consider contributing a Žižek page to Wikisource. Ramanpotential 06:34, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Please read what was stated above. When posting external links, only one pointing to the index of a page is required, there is no need to post absolutely everything into the article. — TheKMantalk 02:08, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Hello again, seriously, please read the above. The amount of external links you are adding to Slavoj Žižek is very excessive, so I will again prune back the section.[1] Also, please be aware of Wikipedia:Three-revert rule. Thanks — TheKMantalk 02:22, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Hi you, You seem seriously to preclude freee access to Zizek's articles in Wikipedia. Under the pretense of fair access you just exclude any one to post Zizek's articles, and by any one I mean publications other than Lacan.com, such as The Guardian, New Left Review, European Graduate School and so on. So please stop spamming and if you want to post your InThese Times articles, please do so, but leave others the freedom to post their articles. And please, seriously stop the bull about Wikipedia rules, You don't seem to care about them nor about freedom of expression. Yours, sincerely Rudolph
Thanks for the reply. Actually, I have no connection with any of these websites and have no preference of one over another (and I defintely have not been spamming anything), but excessive linking within articles is frowned upon, especially when one will do. Anyway, it looks like you found a better Lacan.com link and fixed it, so thanks — TheKMantalk 02:47, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
I'm afraid in spite of your paranoid theories it has absolutely everything to do with Wikipedia policy and nothing to wanting to restrict anyone's access to anything. ANd how you could accuse someone ELSE of "spamming" is unfathomable. Please stop this nonsense. Ramanpotential 10:31, 23 March 2006 (UTC)