User talk:24.21.1.11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Your edit to Drove Chisel

Your recent edit to Drove Chisel (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 07:08, 9 October 2006 (UTC)


[edit] March 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to The Magic Roundabout (film). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ann Stouter 00:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

[edit] May 2007

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Chemistry. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki 23:29, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your view of the organization of the Sciences

I see you have a point of view of how the organization of science should be, one that I do not thing I agree with, but that not the point right now. I don’t think you get some thing that radical in to Wikipedia with out a print source to back you up on that call. Who know it may be out there? That not what I what I wanted to talk to you about. I would be interested in hearing, here or on my talk page, you full argument as to why the science are all just subsets of each other, and if I read you right come back down to a paradigm based on math? Carl 19:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC)