User talk:24.15.249.123

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] September 2007

This is your only warning.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to United States public debt, you will be blocked from editing. Elenseel 01:15, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your only warning.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to United States public debt, you will be blocked from editing. Elenseel 01:18, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for a period of time. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.Kukini hablame aqui 01:23, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

{{unblock|There was no vandalism of the article in question, it's called editing. Whenever subjects are discussed in an article that have nothing to do with the subject matter of the article AND do not cite sources, they are rightfully deleted, aka edited out. This article was written with a heavy POV and is far from neutral in its original form. Figures are presented in a tilted way, irrelevant hypotheticals are discussed which add nothing to understanding the article topic. Most of the deleted items were deleted because they were merely verbatim copies of a well known opinion piece found on political websites (e.g., Ron Paul's presidential campaign site), whose purpose is to criticize the government policies of the United States. The purpose of the wiki article is to explain the US national debt from a neutral POV, and while both sides of a controversy may be presented, the shameless presentation of one POV alone undeniably deserves deleting/editing. Whoever the college campus-inhabitant is that is upset with the deletions is merely upset that a neutral POV was about to be achieved. }}