User talk:24.131.174.4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


[edit] September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Tim Pawlenty. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 17:17, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] This user has consistent history of pro-GOP NPOV-violation with almost every single edit; often also in violation of no 3 unilateral reverts

I have "assumed good faith" for a long time, but there is no need to make assumptions one way or another after watching a user's consistent pattern of contributions. This user's edits have an established history of pro-GOP NPOV-violations with almost every single edit, mostly bowdlerizing the article on Tim Pawlenty and inserting NPOV-violating, unreferenced remarks on the article for Nick Coleman (columnist). This user is either a paid GOP staffer or the self-motivated functional equivalent of one.

For example, this user has removed the entire "controversies" section of the Tim Pawlenty article many times recently, including four times within a fraction of a 24-hour period - a per se violation of the three revert rule, not to mention tendentious editing:

Hello, IP user: if you would like to start making contributions to Wikipedia, please read the policies linked in the welcome message above, especially the ones I have also linked above, and then start making more edits if you are interested in making contributions of encyclopedic information, that conform to those policies. You might also want to read Wikipedia:Tendentious_editing#Characteristics_of_problem_editors.

Otherwise, get your own blog, where you can post any opinions and unreferenced assertions you want and no one will ever remove them. But Wikipedia will become ever more diligent about quickly removing any partisan agenda you try to slip into it. More edits along the lines of your recent contributions are going to keep getting quickly removed, and may end up getting you blocked.

Hope this helps.

- Reaverdrop (talk/nl) 04:42, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Tim Pawlenty appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. X Marx The Spot (talk) 04:59, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.