User talk:24.123.46.167

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Teardrop Trailer, you will be blocked from editing.


Sorry, but you have a long history of trying to post spam links for Lil Guy Trailers. This is just yet another attempt. We can do this dance forever.


I'm sorry but I have just spent time and effort adding a serious addition for the inclusion of commercial application Teardrop articluated trailers - I have no history of spamming and am now very disillusioned about the wikipedia concept! - Is every definition accurate so long as no-one else deletes large amounts of data refering to something else they don't like? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.36.124.98 (talk) 18:03, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


This wasn't designed to be blatant advertising - no unvalidated claims have been made and the information was purely factual. I will attempt to create a new definition. I take it this page has been subject to much abuse in the past. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RichardOwens (talk • contribs) 13:03, 7 January 2008 (UTC)


Like I don't know that you are continuing to SPAM for Lil guy trailers sold by Gander. We can do this dance forever. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.19.210.8 (talk) 19:48, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

I won't deny any of that, but the link is so weak, no one will ever make the connection. They aren't featured on their website thus denying any exposure to Little Guy while people are sitting at home on their computer. Even when they go to Gander Mountain, the trailers are called 'Gander Sport' and 'Gander Outback' not 'Little Guy.' The bottom line is that teardrop trailers are finally getting the recognition they deserve. As gas prices rise and exposure is gained, TDT's will become increasingly popular. Then again, I think that perhaps some of us in this community don't want to share TDT's with everyone else. They make us happy and they are our own.

[edit] March 2008

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —EncMstr 01:13, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "reporting individual is militant; won't accept outside links of any type including non-SPAM additions to websites that merely provide additional information about teardrop camper trailers, such as CampADK and Mikenchells - which is the virtual meeting ground for all TDT enthusiasts. They provide a wealth of information this small page does not."

Decline reason: "With an edit summary like this, it is clear that you are the one acting abusively. Add to that the fact that you have clearly been edit-warring and I'm afraid the block stands. In the future, please do not directly edit Teardrop trailer. You are free to suggest changes by abiding by WP:CIVIL and suggesting them on Talk:Teardrop trailer. — Yamla (talk) 14:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "very well...i accept your decision. with respect to edit-warring, does the other militant party suffer any consequences? if not, i really don't understand. The edit summary comment was a product his/her untoward behavior - he/she was acting in a dictator-like style by blocking all useful content, including, but not limited to educational sites, teardrop venues and the like. The bottom line is, he/she is a worse offender than i since he is stifling general subject matter matter knowledge enhancement."

Decline reason: "Stated bluntly, it is perhaps better if you take care of your own matters first before worrying about others. Tu quoque is not, and never will be, a valid excuse for inappropriate behavior. — Kurykh 18:26, 28 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.