User talk:217.34.39.123

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sorry, don't know quite how this system works, but it appears to me that you have removed many parts of the Littlejohn page which are fact. for example:

The Michael Winner incident

On one episode of Littlejohn's London Weekend Television show Richard Littlejohn Live And Uncut in 1994, two lesbian guests (one of whom was former Lambeth council leader Linda Bellos) argued in favour of lesbians becoming parents. Littlejohn was very critical of the two women, which led to celebrity guest Michael Winner denouncing Littlejohn as an "arsehole" and condemning him as homophobic. Nigella Lawson, who was also present, described Littlejohn's views as "extreme".

This did indeed happen and has been re-shown on UK tv a number of times including "THE 100 GREATEST MOMENTS FROM TV HELL" shown: Saturday 09/09/00, Channel 4.


You have removed all criticism and controversy from the Richard Littlejohn page, much of it important, relevant and fully-sourced. I appreciate that some material needed to be removed, but you have removed vastly more referenced work than unreferenced. Thank you for your attempts to keep the article on an even keel, but try not to apply so wide a brush in future.FrFintonStack 06:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please stop

It's getting quite irritating, there are SEVEN sources in the article, some is unsourced but in removing the whole thing you are ruining the article. Clean it up by all means but i don't know how you can justify removing such a vast section of the article. The opiniouns section you removed is also fully sourced.

Thefredz 14:36, 8 December 2006 (UTC)