User talk:21655/April 16 2008

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive Let me get something straight here: this page is an archive. Basically, it's the Wikipedia equivalent of shoving old emails into a folder and forgetting about them.

If you're thinking of dropping me a line regarding what I insist on calling "my greatness", do so on my current talk page—not here.


Thank'ee much,

T.O.S.F.F.

Contents

re: WP:ADCO

Hi 21655, sure, that'd be fine! (It appears Compwhizii is on break, freeing up my coaching time with him). Perhaps you could let me know what sort of areas you'd like to concentrate on, etc? ~ Riana ⁂ 00:41, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

I have....no clue. Let's start from the beginning? 21655 τalk/ ʃign 14:49, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
I've created a new page at User talk:21655/AC. And don't worry about lack of notification: I've the Watchlist notifier installed in my monobook. 21655 τalk/ ʃign 17:09, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Whoops

I'm sorry if my edit summary came across as WP:OWN or WP:POV. I was pretty sure Disturbed was alternative metal. Can you point me to the thread stating otherwise? 21655 τalk/ ʃign 17:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

No worries. I want to make it clear to you that we are not determining the genre of the band; the band's sound does that. We are simply discussing which display of genres would be most efficient and bias-free. The discussions have taken place on the talk page and can be found here for the headline, and a little everywhere for the genres (here, for example). If you would like to throw another section in there concerning the genre(s) that should be mentionned in the article, feel free, but remember to use reliable and verifiable sources. I would be glad to take part in the discussion. Have a nice day! Zouavman Le Zouave 19:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

List of films that used LightWave 3D

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of films that used LightWave 3D, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of List of films that used LightWave 3D. Elfits FOR GREAT JUSTICE (klat) 20:39, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Heh?

What page are referring to? Mww113 (talk) 23:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Ah, yes. That was a typo, I had the full ip on mywatchlist but I removed it about an hour ago. Nothing to worry about, It was just that a new user made an edit that you correctly reverted was warned a little to harshly by you. Nothing much but a stern warning as the first item on a new users talkpage might be a little indimidating. In the future, please try to use a basic Welcome to Wikipedia, I reverd your edit, please see the sandbox for all tests, or a simmeler template. Nothing to fret over, just friendly advise =). Mww113 (talk) 23:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Re:?

Yeah. Your reports at WP:AIV are almost always good, and I have a lot of respect for your work in that area. Where are we going with this? Malinaccier Public (talk) 23:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


...

Wow. You, sir, are some sort of imbecile. How many mistakes have you made today? No wonder that subpage is there. 21655 τalk/ ʃign 15:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey, thanks for this dude. Much appreciated. Tiptoety talk 15:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks (2)

Thanks for recent help and advice (WP:UTM). Much appreciated. Plantsurfer (talk) 08:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

vandalism by Hottstuffbaby

see user talk:hottstuffbaby next step? Plantsurfer (talk) 15:28, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Angry IP user

Hi 21655, thanks for removing the vandalism on my talk page. Apparently some angry 3rd grader thinks I'm a "fuckin faggot" [sic]. It's stuff like this that makes me wonder why we still let anonymous editing here. --Eastlaw (talk) 18:44, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for your fast revert :). I actually started using Huggle today. Seems like they're after me now because I have a powerful tool ;-). PseudoOne (talk) 20:18, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello, 21655! A project you are involved in, The WikiCup ,has signed up for automatic message delivery from StormBot, an automated bot account using AutoWikiBrowser. StormBot will be delivering you news and notifications about the project on your talk page. If anything is wrong or you have any suggestions to make, please notify the creator, Stormtracker94. Thank you.

Vandalism Lists

Thought i'd better notify you of this, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Best Vandalism Lists. Since a section of your page is in question as well. Have a nice night TheProf - T / C 22:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Oh, i see you have already removed yours (or had it deleted). I guess mine will go the same way! Killjoys eh! What to do with them? I bet they hate every other aspect of Wikipedia humour as well! Anyway, just ignore me! lol -- Thanks TheProf - T / C 22:41, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Love the greek ;-) TheProf - T / C 13:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


As far as we're both concerned, the above never happened.

man what? My posts on the discussion page were reverted anyway, and I still don't know why so many apple products have an 'i' in the name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.156.66.153 (talk) 15:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC) Oh. Ok, then. Yeah, not a vandal, as frustrated as I get with wikipedia sometimes. Moving on, then.

I have an account, but.. ehh. At first it was just laziness and I didn't want to log in to make one passing comment. Also I'm still really annoyed at some of the old webcomic stuff where people's votes to keep articles were discounted because they didn't have enough edits, or only had edits relating to webcomics, or somesuch bull. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.156.66.153 (talk) 15:56, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Again?!

You absolutely suck at this. Why did you get Huggle anyway? 21655 ωhατ δo γoυ ωαητ? 15:35, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your tremendous vandal work! Thanks for protecting the integrity of Wikipedia --Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 16:27, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


Don't worry, I'm just getting off now! So I won't be beating you for a while. =) You know I've reverted thousands of vandal work in the past couple of months but you're the only editor (other than vandals) to notice that? Thanks! ----Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 16:27, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: You've got (hate) mail

Thanks for the revert, and for the link, if was amusing. IPs do hundreds/thousands of constructive edits everyday, most of which are while the are reading and notice small mistakes in articles I guess, which is incredibly useful. Although much of the vandalism is done by IPs I think that a blanket ban on them would not benefit the encyclopedia (but would cut down on that sort of comment perhaps!) Thanks again. Tiddly-Tom 19:40, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Lawrence_Cohen

Hi, you might want to know that Avruch changed his oppose to a neutral and gave some reasons for his rethink... it might be something you might want to consider since your oppose says "Avruch put it in a way I couldn't phrase any better myself". Hope that is helpful. ++Lar: t/c 12:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

hey whats your rs name? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Z3Z1AAA (talk • contribs) 16:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

For the love of Pete

Stop messaging me, please. 21655 ωhατ δo γoυ ωαητ? 16:28, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

who is pete? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Z3Z1AAA (talk • contribs) 16:29, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Yellow box

I removed your floating yellow box from this page. Its design, by positioning itself at the bottom of the page, makes it impossible on some MediaWiki skins (the classic one, for instance) to see the GFDL notice, and thus violates the GFDL. Please redesign the banner so that this bug is fixed before re-adding it to your talk page. Thanks. Phil Sandifer (talk) 14:29, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm not an expert on template code, but I believe the problem is the "position: fixed" bit of the syntax. Phil Sandifer (talk) 14:34, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Deal

I'll look the other way :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.159.16.175 (talk) 19:11, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

re:Yo

Sweet! I like it! BTW, My fav ep is How to kill a ninja. RC-0722 247.5/1 19:30, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Actually, you've beaten me quite a few times. BTW, that RC-2702, that looks familiar. Care to explain? RC-0722 247.5/1 19:33, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
I was thinking that, but I wasn't sure. RC-0722 247.5/1 19:35, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Two in a row...

WOW, what a day indeed...

First user CHRIS19910 accused me of vandalizing MIGUEL VELOSO (footballer)'s page (please see edit history and confirm the "vandal" i am), now you accuse me of vandalizing his talk page? This is really really weird, I DID NOTHING OF SUCH!!!

Please check Chris talkpage too see another message i left him regarding this misunderstanding, and you will see also my will to leave WIKIPEDIA for good: almost 2 years helping, never vandalized ONE ARTICLE WHATSOEVER, and have received my share of these unfair accusations...I HOPE this is just a MISTAKE, honestly.

From PORTUGAL, VASCO AMARAL - --217.129.67.28 (talk) 19:53, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm permanently back

ok, I was having a stressful day and overreacted. Sorry about that and don't worry, I'll be beating you to reverts soon enough... Muhuhahahahahahahahahahahahahahah!!! Mwahahahahahahahahaha!!!!! Thingg⊕⊗ 01:46, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

HAHAHA, BWAHAHAHAHA!! ;) Thingg⊕⊗ 00:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
All right... and while you read this, I'll be getting reverts. hehehe.. (I love this place....) Thingg⊕⊗ 00:11, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
NEVEEEERRRRR!!!!! Thingg⊕⊗ 00:15, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar.... :) Thingg⊕⊗ 00:26, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Dang, you got beat to that as well... (BWAHAHAHA) thanks for sharing though. guess that means I'm doing my job right!! >:-) Thingg⊕⊗ 00:49, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

I was trying to find a clean edit myself.

It looks like someone only did a partial revert and then just went on from there. HalfShadow (talk) 00:17, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar, oh yeah!

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For beating me way too much. (and harassing me about me supposedly beating him) Thingg⊕⊗ 00:29, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

another barnstar (boy, am I feeling generous today....)

The Barnstar of Good Humor
ok, this trip marks the fourth time today I've clicked on that "You've got new messages" banner on your userpage. Thingg⊕⊗ 00:39, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank'ee

21655 ωhατ δo γoυ ωαητ? has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

For reverting the BS on my utalk. 21655 ωhατ δo γoυ ωαητ? 20:55, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

No problem :) -[[Ryan]] (me) (talk) 20:57, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

My birthday

Thank you! Basketball110 pick away... 21:57, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

My RFA has closed

My RFA that you weighed in on earlier has closed as no consensus to promote, at a final tally of 120/47/13. I thank you for your feedback and comments there, and I'm going to be considering all the various advice and comments presented. I might end up at RFA again some day, or not. If you see me there again in the future, perhaps you might consider a Support !vote. If not, not, and no hard feelings. The pen is still mightier than the mop! See you around, and thanks again. Lawrence § t/e 18:17, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

This is not a personal attack

The others are WRONG. en.wikipedia.org is for British English. It is NOT for American English. American English should have its own sub domain. I am merely correcting the grammatical errors caused by American editors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.178.252.151 (talk) 19:28, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

RFA Thanks

Thank you for your comments on my RFA. Even though it failed with 28 supports, 42 opposes, and 15 neutrals, I am grateful for the suggestions and advice I have received and I do hope to improve as a Wikipedian. If you ever need my help in any endeavor, feel free to drop me a line. --Sharkface217 20:16, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Comments to blocked users

Please don't make comments like this ever again. They are inappropriate, uncivil, and antagonizing. Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:18, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Why thank you

heh, I hadn't even noticed, so thanks for removing it. :) and no prob on getting rid of the nonsense on your page. Huggle is a wonderful thing... >:-) Thingg⊕⊗ 15:36, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

RE: Thank'ee

No problem. I've been getting it from him all last night and today. Good job i like helping people, or i would be going insane on here! LOL -- Have a nice day :-) TheProf - T / C 15:46, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Regarding the message you left at User talk:148.177.1.210, in what way do you think the edit was "unconstructive"? As I stated in the edit summary, the "see also" section was completely redundant to the navigation template at the bottom of that page. I believe it is constructive to eliminate redundancy. Do you disagree? 148.177.1.210 (talk) 19:51, 15 April 2008 (UTC)