User talk:216.57.91.34

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:
This IP address, 216.57.91.34, is registered to Park Place. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts should be made to contact Park Place to report abuse, which can be done here. Contact information can be viewed in the WHOIS report.
If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it is possible for the owner of the IP, Park Place, to determine who was making contributions from this address at a given time.
If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Skank on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Carinemily 16:55, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Minus 2 Formula, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Minus 2 Formula was changed by 216.57.91.34 (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-11-25T17:05:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC)


This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Minus 2 Formula, you will be blocked from editing. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 17:59, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Minus 2 Formula, you will be blocked from editing. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 17:59, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Royal New Zealand Air Force, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Royal New Zealand Air Force was changed by 216.57.91.34 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-01-29T00:59:16+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 00:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Phil Pfister, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The Evil Spartan (talk) 07:44, 16 February 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Phil Pfister. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Phil Pfister was changed by 216.57.91.34 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-16T21:08:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:08, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Phil Pfister, you will be blocked from editing. Jd027chat 21:10, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Your recent edit to Phil Pfister (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 21:11, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Phil Pfister. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wikitumnus (talk) 21:12, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Phil Pfister (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 21:13, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Phil Pfister (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 21:15, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-- Ed (Edgar181) 21:17, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Two One Six Five Five τ ʃ 21:24, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dae Gak

If you are going to insist the subject is not notable, you should first read WP:N to understand what constitutes notability here on Wikipedia before continuing down that line of reasoning. Notability guidelines make it very clear: notability does not equal fame or even actual importance. Notability is established by providing reliable references. Please look at the references in his article and you will see that notability is clearly established. Since you've obviously not read the source material and use Google hits as an imaginary basis for establishing notability—I would recommend you discontinue the removal of Dae Gak's name as an alumni of the school. Your edits are not constructive and strike of ignorance regarding policy. Have a good one! (Mind meal (talk) 08:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC))