User talk:216.56.30.222

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 216.56.30.222, is registered to University of Wisconsin-Madison and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.


Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Char645 01:10, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Saint Valentine's Day massacre (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 19:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Ice cream. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ElinorD (talk) 20:06, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gary Numan, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. JD554 07:01, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Oconto, Wisconsin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Davewild 17:40, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Poodle, you will be blocked from editing. --lquilter 19:45, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Charles Darwin, you will be blocked from editing. de Bivort 20:45, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to A Separate Peace, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: A Separate Peace was changed by 216.56.30.222 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-10-18T19:22:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 19:22, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Greek philosophy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Neranei (talk) 19:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] Regarding your edits to Greek philosophy:

Your recent edit to Greek philosophy (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 19:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Attorney General. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 16:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gary Numan, you will be blocked from editing. --Oxymoron83 17:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Kiss, you will be blocked from editing. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 17:45, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 16:56, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 1930-1945 in fashion. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Snowolf How can I help? 20:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Turkmen people, you will be blocked from editing.  --Lambiam 18:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Robert Wadlow, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 18:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to July 17 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 15:30, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Special session. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Special session was changed by 216.56.30.222 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-12T17:29:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Little Turtle (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 19:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Globe Theatre, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 16:12, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-- Ed (Edgar181) 16:30, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Hybrid electric vehicle has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 16:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Your recent edit to Islamabad Capital Territory (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 13:16, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Peanut butter (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 15:51, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 19th century, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 19th century was changed by 216.56.30.222 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-03-28T19:21:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:21, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Boeing 787. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Whale plane (talk) 18:53, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Rotifer has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Thingg 17:36, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Eram Garden has been reverted. Please do not remove content from pages without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 16:08, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to John R. Erickson has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.  :-) Stwalkerstertalk ] 14:04, 30 May 2008 (UTC)