User talk:216.167.133.159

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Shamrock, Texas are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Please stop campaigning against the city, and the other post, in the Shamrock talk page. All of the comments have been moved to an archive so that appropriate discussion, i.e. discussion about the article, not the city, can take place. This is not a forum for your to continue attacking the city, slandering living people, and pushing your personal agenda. It has no place here. Collectonian (talk) 18:54, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Your Recent Edits

With regard to your comments on User talk:Collectonian‎: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Collectonian's talk pageDustitalk to me 19:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Please allow me to review the discussion. I will get back with you soon. Dustitalk to me 19:20, 14 April 2008 (UTC)


Thank you. This is all that we ask. Your response (as opposed to the rapid deletion and ignoring of the question) is most appreciated.--216.167.133.159 (talk) 19:24, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
At this time, the discussion on all parts is more in depth than I am comfortable dealing with. I am going to call in an Administrator to review the case and take the appropriate actions he deems necessary. Please hold further discussion until your contacted by an Administrator. Dustitalk to me 20:26, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. Again, this is more than I've gotten from Collectonian in more than a month of attempting to establish a meaningful dialog. If someone (anyone) could be bothered to observe (before deleting), what will be learned is that this is NOT a matter of "a bitter individual who is attacking the city" so much as it IS a matter of a city official who has taken it upon himself to discredit the owner of a media outlet who obtained information that (unless quashed) would result in many federal prosecutions.
I will comply with your request. However, I would also request that any posts made by the opposing party in attempting to attack the owner of the radio station be removed as were ours. The owner of the radio station is guilty of one thing: Uncovering and exposing corruption in this area. Unfortunately, one of those that he revealed was the local DA who was selling drugs from his courthouse offices and the man ad more than adequate time to seekl revenge before he was sent to federal prison following his multiple guilty pleas.
Our disagreement with Collectonian is in that it seems to be "OK" for the city official to post unsubstantiated "evidence" (linking to non-existent information that "looks" official but leads nowhere) while our posts that are linked to sbstantiating court documents are deleted as soon as they appear. Something is "not right" about this practice--216.167.133.159 (talk) 22:20, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Response

From my talk page:

In response to Pellesmith (from Dustihowe's Talk Page): "The IP" is not posting from various IP's in order to void anything. "The IP" is poosting from various addresses because the area is so remote that the only available connections are "dial up" and this, by it's very nature, results in a freshly assigned IP address with each new connection attempt.
Have you all advanced so far beyond the technologies available to us that everything must arouse suspicion of a great conspiracy?--216.167.133.159 (talk) 23:48, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
There is no conspiracy, nor have I claimed one, but why should s/he resist the urge to simply create a user account, and then get upset when someone else has gone through the trouble to string together some continuity and transparency in her/his edit history? I was only suggesting that her/his behavior was such as to suggest exactly that explanation. It has been suggested that this IP user simply get a user account at which point none of this would matter. I'm not sure what the problem is with that. Cheers.PelleSmith (talk) 01:17, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
FYI, on Dustihowe's Talk page I was not talking about your IP, unless you are also the IP starting with 75 who was trolling Talk:Fitna (film). Cheers.PelleSmith (talk) 01:23, 15 April 2008 (UTC)


I apologize, PelleSmith. I misunderstood.Th formatting of these talk pages is very unusual to me. I accept full responsibility for themisunderstanding and ask your forgiveness.--216.167.133.159 (talk) 14:42, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button Image:Signature_icon.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:23, 15 April 2008 (UTC)