User talk:209.242.132.51

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] August 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Alpha Chi Rho. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jmlk17 22:02, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
  • Just to tell you that I am not the one that reverted your edit on Alpha Chi Rho. The message that I left you dates back to May 2007 when you actually vandalized an article Cox Communications by replacing content with what?. The message saying that you vandalized Alpha Chi Rho is not from me, it is from an administrator named User:Jmlk17, so you might want to contact User:Jmlk17 about this situation. NHRHS2010 Talk 23:47, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Alpha Chi Rho, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jmlk17 22:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Alpha Chi Rho. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Jmlk17 22:48, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] March 2008

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Mark Foley. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 00:24, 20 March 2008 (UTC)