User talk:209.226.9.2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 209.226.9.2, is used by Brampton Public Library, Brampton, Ontario, Canada and may be shared by multiple users using public terminals. In the case of organizations using proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. (In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism in which case we invite you to try again at a later time or from a different computer.)

In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact Brampton Public Library, Brampton, Ontario, Canada to report network abuse.

Public terminals may have set expiry times (usually 30 minutes or 60 minutes), so if blocking the IP please bear this in mind.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] Your edit to Wikipedia:New contributors' help page

Your recent edit to Wikipedia:New contributors' help page (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 16:22, 21 October 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Toronto Blue Jays

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Toronto Blue Jays. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. PAK Man 17:58, 15 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] April 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Toronto Blue Jays, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Caltas 17:59, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Toronto Blue Jays, you will be blocked from editing. Flyguy649talkcontribs 18:02, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Jupiter has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 21:38, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Toru Kumon, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Toru Kumon was changed by 209.226.9.2 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-03-28T14:29:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:29, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ghetto. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --SJP (talk) 19:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Politics of Hawaii. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Caltas (talk) 17:59, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Your recent edit to Wizard Howl (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 23:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Lolcat. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. MCB (talk) 18:40, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Environmental factor has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. RapidR (talk) 21:39, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Environmental factor constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. ——Ryan | t • c 21:41, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Environmental factor (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 21:46, 20 May 2008 (UTC)