User talk:209.104.229.66

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 209.104.229.66, is registered to St. Paul's School (Concord, New Hampshire) and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.


Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] September 2006

Your recent edit to Anal sex (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 21:40, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Anal sex (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 01:11, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Anal sex (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 00:12, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to F. Scott Fitzgerald, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Nlu (talk) 19:00, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] October 2006

Your recent edit to Anal sex (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 02:56, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Bayerischermann - 02:56, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Anal sex (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 00:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Al-Kateb v Godwin (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 23:20, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to F. Scott Fitzgerald. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 23:48, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to F. Scott Fitzgerald, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 23:53, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] November 2006

Your recent edit to Party (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 00:41, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] December 2006

Your recent edit to Body composition (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 01:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Charlemagne page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Ian Cairns 12:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Autobahn. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. the_undertow talk 00:42, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to March 29, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Corpx 20:47, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Your recent edit to St. Paul's School (Concord, New Hampshire) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 00:49, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.

--Nlu (talk) 05:02, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Walt Whitman, you will be blocked from editing. --Midnightdreary (talk) 19:17, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Linda Cook (business) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Lazulilasher (talk) 18:32, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Lend-Lease has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:53, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to St. Paul's School (Concord, New Hampshire), you will be blocked from editing. SMS Talk 15:01, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edit to Fala (dog) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 15:08, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Your recent edit to Tristan and Iseult (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 14:15, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Tristan und Isolde constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Epbr123 (talk) 14:15, 13 May 2008 (UTC))