User talk:208.25.243.137

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 208.25.243.137, is registered to proxy.vcs.k12.nc.us and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] December 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Gadsden Purchase, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 17:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Uploading and downloading, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 14:13, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dunite, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dunite was changed by 208.25.243.137 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-02-05T13:55:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Dunite constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 13:57, 5 February 2008 (UTC))


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Coal, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Coal was changed by 208.25.243.137 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-02-05T13:59:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

—slakr\ talk / 14:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Nuclear fission has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Prodego talk 15:00, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Hybrid electric vehicle. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --Oxymoron83 19:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Hybrid electric vehicle. · AndonicO Hail! 19:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Paul Robeson (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 18:58, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Frances Bavier has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN aka john lennon 19:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Frances Bavier constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 19:23, 3 March 2008 (UTC))

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Keyshia Cole: The Way It Is. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. VMS Mosaic (talk) 17:56, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to North Carolina v. Mann, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: North Carolina v. Mann was changed by 208.25.243.137 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-04-14T12:51:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:51, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Germans. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. yettie0711 (talk) 13:53, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Induced gamma emission has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. StaticGull  Talk  14:56, 15 May 2008 (UTC)