User talk:207.69.139.160

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

Someone using this IP address has made inappropriate edits, which have been reverted. If you did this, in the future please try to contribute in a more constructive manner. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

If you need help see:

Here are a few more good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! RBot 04:27, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Attention:

This IP address, 207.69.139.160, is registered to EarthLink, an Internet service provider through which thousands of individual users may connect to the internet. This IP may be randomly assigned to a different person when the current user disconnects. Warnings or messages left on this page may not be received by the intended user. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 17:13, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Erichthonius of Athens, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Lowris 23:16, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Gautama Buddha, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. - Dakota ~ ° 05:28, 22 March 2006 (UTC)


[edit] March 2007

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Frida Kahlo on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Kimontalk 16:43, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

[edit] April 2007

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.--Ted87 07:25, 26 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] =Welcome

Welcome to wikipedia, I saw your edit on the List of Iranic states and empires page. If you have any comments or concerns please add them to the talk page. Why dont you create an account? Londium 20:07, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RE Aggressive Christianity Missionary Training Corps

Good question! I see you're relatively new to Wikipedia, and I'll try to answer your question to the best of my ability. My source choices were not based on point of view (I have no real "point of view" on them, all I did was Google search them and start the article after a few day's research and work), but instead based on reliable sources available. The sources that I included were from the Rick Ross Institute, a reputable cult research center, and from local newspaper articles (Albuquerque Journal, The Sacramento Union, etc., and also from the book "Kooks/a Guide to the Outer Limits of Human Belief", all of which I sourced properly. There have been several edits since my initial creation, some of which are substantial, and have added some less reputable (and less "web 2.0", I might add) sources and text.

After I created what you see in my first few edits there, I basically abandoned the article. I'm sure it's far from incomplete, and probably has some parts that are imbalanced. It's currently unrated and under-sourced, so I make no efforts to pretend that the article is air-tight or complete. It's a stub, take it for what it is. I can't take responsibility for what's been added since my edits, earlier. As for not using the group's own website, I'll be honest, the website doesn't look very reliable (looks to heavily slant things in a pro-acmtc light) - which is fine, it's the Internet, and that's their right to have whatever POV they'd like. My editing style is to take published sources only as a general rule, and start articles from there, rather than self-published materials.

I'd try and assure you that I have no bad intentions either way here, but it's Wikipedia, we'll never meet, and frankly I'm not bothered by the idea of someone somewhere in the world on the other end of this webpage feeling poorly about me, so I won't bother. Check my edit history if you're wondering about any biases or whatever I bring to Wikipedia, and draw your own conclusions. You can find them here.

As far as the article goes, feel free to make any edits you'd like. I'm probably not going to re-visit the article, so for all I care you can turn it into a tribute to Donald Duck :) I hope my response hasn't put you off, I'm just coming out of a long day at work. I hope you're having a good wiki experience. Happy edits! Nswinton\talk 00:51, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to You Can't See Me, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: You Can't See Me was changed by 207.69.139.160 (c) (t) making a minor change censoring content (Wikipedia is not censored) on 2007-11-20T21:22:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:22, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Time travel has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Nn123645 (talk) 02:58, 26 May 2008 (UTC)