User talk:207.62.231.2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 207.62.231.2, is registered to California State University Network and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
Attention:
This IP address, 207.62.231.2, is registered to Sierra College through the California State University Network. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts should be made to contact Sierra College to report abuse, which can be done here. Contact information can be viewed in the WHOIS report.
If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it is possible for the owner of the IP, Sierra College, to determine who was making contributions from this address at a given time.
If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

Thank you for experimenting with the page Falling Up on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Andrew_pmk | Talk 00:26, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Philosophical fallacy

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Philosophical fallacy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Philosophical fallacy. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TigerShark 13:36, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Barbie Blank

Your recent edit to Barbie Blank (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 23:23, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Homo erectus. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. –- kungming·2 | (Talk·Contact) 16:07, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Olympic Games. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. JDtalk 20:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Olympic Games. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. JDtalk 20:53, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Olympic Games. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. JDtalk 20:59, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to A Perfect Day for Bananafish

Your recent edit to A Perfect Day for Bananafish (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 19:33, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. One or more of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Western Wrestling Conference, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Minkus 00:30, 24 April 2007 (UTC)


Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KJS77 20:18, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Kyle. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- zzuuzz(talk) 20:27, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Caution: Vandalism on California Gold Rush.

[edit] May 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to California Gold Rush. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. de:Spongo 21:45, 10 May 2007 (UTC)


This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to California Gold Rush, you will be blocked from editing. de:Spongo 21:51, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Rubik's Cube (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 03:48, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gran Chaco, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Gran Chaco was changed by 207.62.231.2 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-02-13T15:55:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

I removed your edits to King Philip's War. "The war spread" is correct grammar. "Spreaded" is not a word. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 23:14, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to King Philip's War has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 23:15, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Rome: Total War, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. XRK (talk) 19:58, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Your recent edit to Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 22:02, 6 May 2008 (UTC)