User talk:206.45.119.100
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thank you for experimenting with the page Prime Minister of Canada on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Anger22 18:03, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -- Vary | Talk 15:14, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Chevrolet Corvette, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gzuckier 20:03, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Wilfrid Laurier. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Benwildeboer 20:19, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Your edit to Alberta
Your recent edit to Alberta (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 20:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Alberta, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Malerin 21:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] February 9, 2007
Thank you for experimenting with the page Pluto on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. —Wknight94 (talk) 19:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] February 2007
Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Louis Riel. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--DSRH | talk 15:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Hotel Rwanda, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Matteo (User page, talk) 15:41, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your edit to Hotel Rwanda
Your recent edit to Hotel Rwanda (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 19:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] April 17
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 19:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 19:16, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] May 2007
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Act of Union 1840, you will be blocked from editing. akendall 19:08, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
[edit] Blocked
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated.-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:10, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit to First Nations (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 15:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Deleting content in First Nations
Please do not delete content from Wikipedia, as you did to First Nations. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you truly feel that removing content from an article is justified, please consider discussing your proposed changes on the article's talk page first. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you.
Kyoko 15:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] June 2007
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Suez Crisis. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 19:14, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] September 2007
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 101 Dalmatians. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 20:23, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Layering, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 15:36, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] January 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SoLando (Talk) 21:18, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Saturn (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 20:15, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] February 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Energy drink has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 17:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Energy drink constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 17:35, 11 February 2008 (UTC))
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Energy drink, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Energy drink was changed by 206.45.119.100 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-02-11T17:37:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:37, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Energy drink. Keilana|Parlez ici 17:38, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Air Canada Centre, you will be blocked from editing. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:37, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
[edit] March 2008
Your recent edit to Architecture of Africa (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 21:05, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Timeline of World War II (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 15:39, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Respect (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 17:37, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Respect. EJF (talk) 17:50, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] April 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to SOS has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. PseudoOne (talk) 19:56, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] May 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tom Hanks. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jons63 (talk) 20:26, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Ottawa Senators.
Any further vandalism will result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. RGTraynor 16:28, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Shakespeare's plays, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ashton1983 (talk) 18:16, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Welcome to Fabulous Las Vegas sign. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Welcome to Fabulous Las Vegas sign was changed by 206.45.119.100 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-08T18:53:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Loophole. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 18:59, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
| | This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |

