User talk:206.116.63.240

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] April 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to User talk:64.53.161.26, you will be blocked from editing. Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 02:31, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You don't get to characterize that edit as vandalism, because it wasn't. I was giving a bitten newby helpful advice, which is a lot more than he was getting from anyone else. Don't bite the newcomers. You should be templated for that. 206.116.63.240 (talk) 02:34, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
By the way, if an actual admin cares to do a checkuser, it will be pretty evident who this is. Your reaction is proof positive of what is broken with the Wikipedia culture, and why I no longer edit here. The most you would have on me in a healthy culture is an extremely mild case of WP:DICK - not disruptive vandalism. Now grow up and learn to play nice and actually follow policy as it was written and intended - or don't, and continue to prove my point for me. Your choice. 206.116.63.240 (talk) 02:38, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

hey dickhead, dont revert my edits on the namedropping page. leave it as it is. --211.26.243.73 (talk) 12:06, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Er, no, I think I'll keep on reverting your unwanted addition of irrelevant redlink names which have already been reverted countless times as vandalism. You are a vandal, and an uncivil one at that. You seem to think you have some kind of right to keep adding this useless sentence fragment to the article but in the reality that exists outside your one-track mind, you do not. 206.116.63.240 (talk) 01:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)