User talk:205.211.52.10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 205.211.52.10, is registered to Algonquin College and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to George W. Bush. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --W.marsh 14:46, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Built to Spill

Thanks for your compliment. I will try to find a more recent photo of the band to put in the article this week. There certainly have been changes since that photo was taken . . . - Jersyko·talk 05:17, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Lebanon. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – Gurch 16:40, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Personal attacks on Black British

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Wildnox 22:37, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Pussy

Your recent edit to Pussy (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 08:18, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding reversions[1] made on October 25, 2006 to J. Philippe Rushton

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning, but aviod making any reverts within 24 hours of this warning in order to avoid any confusion. Nishkid64 01:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

You are right, but the community decision was reached on the talk page. If you want to discuss the page, and try to make suggestions in how the page can be fixed up and brought up to par, be my guest. If you want to discuss and/or try to validate your point, then feel free to do so in a civilized and productive manner. Thanks. Nishkid64 01:50, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
I have removed the semi-protection there, but that does not mean that you should change it so drastically without discussion. If you are removing material per WP:BLP make sure you cite BLP and remove only unsourced statements. If there is some sourced criticism, it should probably stay in but be phrased in a much more neutral manner, not removed (unless it is nothing more than: "his work is laughable", which I removed) The article does need major clean up and major balancing out, but edit warring over it will not help that happen. If the revert warring continues the article might need to be fully protected.--Konst.ableTalk 03:56, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] No personal attacks

Do not threaten that they will be blocked permanently or calling other users "idiot" as you did to RamDrake and Asams10. You will be blocked if you continue to do so. This is your final and only warning. Any more of this, and you will be blocked for a period of time. Nishkid64 20:36, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for trying to help with the Rushton article

I see you attempted to work a compromise with the Rushton critics by removing both the theory and the criticism section. To me it's so obviously biased that I'm shocked that they can't see it. For example, the entire praise section is from the pioneer fund, so the praise section is just a subtle way of trying to bash him some more. I just wish they'd come out and admit that they want to censor his ideas, because this "biography's not a place to discuss his theory, but it is a place to discuss criticism of his theory is really laughable". I could even agree with removing his ideas from wikipedia because they aren't proven and could be socially damaging. But what frustrates me is that they only want to censor his theory, while using his article as a platform to completely discredit him. Minorcorrections 05:54, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Abhishek

Your recent edit to Abhishek (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 17:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] January 2007

[edit] Your changes to Chemistry

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ann Stouter 04:01, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Chocolate, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- WolfKeeper 00:18, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Optical fiber, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. johnpseudo 16:03, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

If you wish to contribute to this encyclopedia, please
create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, editing by anonymous users from your school or institution's IP address is currently disabled. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this address is probably also disabled.

  • If accounts need to be created at school for class projects, please have your teacher or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at unblock-en-l from an email address listed on your school's website.
  • Alternatively, if you have no Internet access at home, you may email us using your school-issued email address and an account will be created for you.

Thank you.

Comments: Kafziel Talk 17:03, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Duress

Your recent edit to Duress (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 19:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Intranet, you will be blocked from editing. Pablo Talk | Contributions 22:15, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 20:29, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Wide Area Augmentation System, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 15:01, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Hall effect. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.E Wing (talk) 14:53, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gary Bettman, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Gary Bettman was changed by 205.211.52.10 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-12-04T14:48:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 14:48, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Notre Dame High School (Ottawa), even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 15:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Gang Green (album). Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Spellcast (talk) 08:56, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008