User talk:203.88.128.94

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | interiot's tool | page moves | block log | block list]

[edit] May 2007

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Firewall (networking). Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Thank you. — isilanes (talk|contribs) 14:19, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Virtual private network. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Thank you. — isilanes (talk|contribs) 14:19, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Single sign-on. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Thank you. — isilanes (talk|contribs) 14:19, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to List of content-control software. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Thank you. — isilanes (talk|contribs) 14:19, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Identity management. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — isilanes (talk|contribs) 14:19, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Why, oh why, are there so many "objective" contributors whose only contributions are a spree of edits including a link to the same commercial site into all Wikipedia articles remotely related with the market of the company owning the site? A couple of your edits (namely Identity Driven Networking and Unified threat management) seem more or less legitimate, but certainly the other five are not. Have you considered contributing to the Wikipedia fruitfully, then including one or two of your spam-links into articles where they might belong? Maybe you wouldn't be considered a blatant spammer that way, you know? — isilanes (talk|contribs) 14:19, 21 May 2007 (UTC)